Gus Miller v. Lenard Vare' et al

Gus Miller v. Lenard Vare' et al

Case Number:	3:2005cv00703
Filed:	December 21, 2005
Court:	US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office:	Reno Office
Presiding Judge:	Robert A. McQuaid
Presiding Judge:	Edward C. Reed
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 3, 2009	Filing 58 JUDGMENT: for the reasons assigned: (a) that Grounds 2(a), 2(c), 2(d), 3(a)(1) & (2), 3(c)(1) & (2), 6(a), and 7(a) are DISMISSED with prejudice as procedurally defaulted; (b) that Grounds 2(e), 3(b)(1-4), 4(c)(1-2), 5(b)(1-2), 6(b), 6(c), 7(b), 8(a ), and 8(b) are DISMISSED with prejudice, on the merits to the extent that the claims are based upon allegations of ineffective assistance of counsel and on the basis of procedural default to the extent that the claims are not. Final judgment is entered, in favor of respondents and against petitioner, dismissing this action with prejudice. Signed by Lance S. Wilson on 2/3/2009. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KL)
February 2, 2009	Filing 57 ORDER: for the reasons assigned: (a) that Grounds 2(a), 2(c),2(d), 3(a)(1) & (2), 3(c)(1) & (2), 6(a), and 7(a) are DISMISSED with prejudice as procedurally defaulted; (b) that Grounds 2(e), 3(b)(1-4), 4(c)(1-2), 5(b)(1-2), 6(b), 6(c), 7(b), 8(a), a nd 8(b)are DISMISSED with prejudice on the merits; and (c) that Grounds 5(c) and 9 areDISMISSED with prejudice, on the merits to the extent that the claims are based upon allegations of ineffective assistance of counsel and on the basis of procedural default to the extent that the claims are not. The Clerk of Court shall enter final judgment accordingly, in favor of respondents and against petitioner, dismissing this action with prejudice. Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 2/2/2009. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KL)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 3, 2009

Filing 58 JUDGMENT: for the reasons assigned: (a) that Grounds 2(a), 2(c), 2(d), 3(a)(1) & (2), 3(c)(1) & (2), 6(a), and 7(a) are DISMISSED with prejudice as procedurally defaulted; (b) that Grounds 2(e), 3(b)(1-4), 4(c)(1-2), 5(b)(1-2), 6(b), 6(c), 7(b), 8(a ), and 8(b) are DISMISSED with prejudice, on the merits to the extent that the claims are based upon allegations of ineffective assistance of counsel and on the basis of procedural default to the extent that the claims are not. Final judgment is entered, in favor of respondents and against petitioner, dismissing this action with prejudice. Signed by Lance S. Wilson on 2/3/2009. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KL)

February 2, 2009

Filing 57 ORDER: for the reasons assigned: (a) that Grounds 2(a), 2(c),2(d), 3(a)(1) & (2), 3(c)(1) & (2), 6(a), and 7(a) are DISMISSED with prejudice as procedurally defaulted; (b) that Grounds 2(e), 3(b)(1-4), 4(c)(1-2), 5(b)(1-2), 6(b), 6(c), 7(b), 8(a), a nd 8(b)are DISMISSED with prejudice on the merits; and (c) that Grounds 5(c) and 9 areDISMISSED with prejudice, on the merits to the extent that the claims are based upon allegations of ineffective assistance of counsel and on the basis of procedural default to the extent that the claims are not. The Clerk of Court shall enter final judgment accordingly, in favor of respondents and against petitioner, dismissing this action with prejudice. Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 2/2/2009. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KL)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gus Miller v. Lenard Vare' et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?