Allen L. Wisdom v. State Of Nevada et al
| 3:2006cv00094 |
| February 17, 2006 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| Valerie P. Cooke |
| Philip M. Pro |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
256
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff Wisdom's Second Motion for Voluntary Dismissal of Entire Action 255 is GRANTED for purposes of clarifying that this entire action has been dismissed and that judgment is hereby entered in favor of all Defendants and against Plaintiff Wisdom. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 4/11/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC) Modified on 4/11/2011 to reflect copies of 253 Order and 254 Judgment were re-mailed to Plaintiff. (MLC).
|
|
Filing
254
JUDGMENT. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 239 is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendants ALPS Corporation; Attorneys Liability Protection Society, Inc.; Da vid R. Grundy (in his capacities as an individual and as a director of ALPS Corporation and Attorneys Liability Protection Society, Inc.); Lemons, Grundy, & Eisenberg; Scott A. Glogovac;Gregory J. Livingston; Burton, Bartlett & Glogovac; Estate of Phillip W. Bartlett; Ernest E. Adler; Kilpatrick, Johnson & Adler; and Lorraine Fitch and against Plaintiff Allen Wisdom. Signed by Clerk of Court, Lance S. Wilson on 2/16/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)
|
|
Filing
234
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's Objection to Magistrate Judge Order Re: Joinder of Parties 231 are OVERRULED, and the Magistrate's Order 229 is AFFIRMED. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 10/25/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC) Modified on 10/26/2010 to correct document number. (MLC).
|
|
Filing
232
ORDER granting 174 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint due 11/08/10. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LG)
|
|
Filing
229
MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS - Motion Hearing held on 9/13/2010 before Magistrate Judge Robert A. McQuaid, Jr. Crtrm Administrator: Jennifer Cotter; Pla Counsel: Allen Wisdom, In Pro Per (telephonically); Def Counsel: Eugene Wait, Jr., G regory Livingston, and Scott Glogovac; FTR #: 10:04:02 a.m. - 10:28:14 a.m.; Courtroom: 2. IT IS ORDERED that 196 and 210 Motions to Strike re 179 / 183 are GRANTED; 209 Motion for Joinder of Parties is DENIED; 221 Motion to Expand Number of Interrogatories is GRANTED to the extent as shown in attached minutes; 224 Motion to Exclude Plaintiff's Initial Disclosures is DENIED. Please see attached minutes for further details. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
|
|
Filing
200
ORDER DENYING P Wisdom's 182 Motion to Strike. FURTHER ORD that P Wisdom shall have, not later than May 11, 2010, within which to file a response to D Jeffrey A. Dickerson's # 174 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 4/20/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Allen L. Wisdom v. State Of Nevada et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
