Allinger v. McDaniel et al
| 3:2006cv00139 |
| April 12, 2006 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| Valerie P. Cooke |
| Larry R. Hicks |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
114
ORDER APPROVING 112 parties' Stipulation to lodge their proposed joint pretrial order within 30 days of the disposition of plaintiff's 109 motion for issuance of subpoenas, 110 MOTION for Payment of Fees and Costs, and 111 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 4/10/09. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SL)
|
|
Filing
107
ORDER adopting 93 Report and Recommendation and denying 74 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment; and denying as moot 97 Plaintiff's motion to strike. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall lodge their proposed joint pretrial order within 30 days from entry of this order. ( Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 4/6/2009.) Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 3/4/09. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Allinger v. McDaniel et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
