Johnson v. Dr. John et al
3:2006cv00234 |
April 25, 2006 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Reno Office |
Larry R. Hicks |
Robert A. McQuaid |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 68 JUDGMENT. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Court adopts and accepts the 66 Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge; therefore, Defendants' 50 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED . FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' 49 Motion to Dismiss is MOOT . Signed by Lance S. Wilson on 09/10/09. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC) |
Filing 66 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE re 49 Motion to Dismiss and 50 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants. IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that the District Judge enter an Order GRANTING Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 50 and DENYING AS MOOT Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 49 . Objections to R&R due by 8/2/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert A. McQuaid, Jr. on 7/17/2009. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HJ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Johnson v. Dr. John et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.