Deeds v. Benedetti, et al.
3:2006cv00282 |
May 17, 2006 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Reno Office |
Valerie P. Cooke |
Larry R. Hicks |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 86 ORDER ADOPTING AND ACCEPTING 85 Report and Recommendation. The 80 settlement agreement is RATIFIED as a binding settlement agreement and Ds are ordered to perform as agreed in the 80 settlement agreement. P's 82 Motion to strike fugitive document is DENIED. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice and Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 5/5/2009. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
Filing 85 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE: IT IS RECOMMENDED that the District Court enter an order as follows: 1. RATIFYING the settlement agreement; 2. ORDERING the defendants' to perform as agreed in the settlement agreement (#[80 ]); 3. DISMISSING this case with prejudice; and 4. DENYING plaintiff's 82 motion to strike fugitive agreement. Objections to R&R due by 4/19/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke on 4/2/2009. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KL) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Deeds v. Benedetti, et al. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.