Dunlap v. Palmer, Warden
| George Tyrone Dunlap, Jr. |
| Palmer, Warden and Nevada Attorney General |
| 3:2007cv00019 |
| March 27, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| Washoe |
| Robert C. Jones |
| Robert A. McQuaid |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
67
ORDER Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 47 is denied in its entirety. Clerk shall enter judgment and close case. Petitioner is denied a certificate of appealability. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 3/24/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER GRANTING 48 Motion to Dismiss ( as specified, see pdf order for specifics ) FURTHER ORD Rs' answer to the remaining claims in ground 2 of the # 47 Amended petition shall be filed and served by 10/14/2011. P's reply shall be filed and served within 30 days of service of Rs' answer. Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 9/13/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondents' 57 motion to strike is GRANTED. Petitioner's 56 "Statement of Facts" is stricken and will not be considered by the court for any purpose. Respondents' 48 motion to dismiss is fully briefed and remains pending before the court. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 12/28/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
