Streczyn v. Menu Foods, Inc. et al
| Marion Streczyn |
| Menu Foods, Inc. and Menu Foods Income Fund |
| 3:2007cv00159 |
| April 2, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| Washoe |
| Valerie P. Cooke |
| Larry R. Hicks |
| Prop. Damage Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
|
Filing
38
NOTICE from Defendant Sunshine Mills INC's of Opposition and Opposition to Conditional Transfer Order (CTO-1). (LK)
|
|
Filing
37
Re: MDL Case Transfer & Assignment - Letter from Clerk, USDC., Newark, N.J addressed to Clerk, USDC, Madison, WI - MDL Case has been assigned # 1:07-cv2867(NLH)(AMD) (DRM)
|
|
Filing
36
BEFORE THE JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION from Jeffery N.Luthi, Clerk of the Panel,, addressed to William T. Walsh, clerk for the District of New Jersey, dated July 16, 2007, filed at MDL July 16, 2007 - - no oppposition having been received the conditional transfer order (CTO-1) is directed to be filed. (DRM)
|
|
Filing
35
NOTICE OF OPPOSITION AND OPPOSITION TO CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-1) (DRM)
|
Filing
33
ORDER granting 27 Verified Petition for Permission for Michael P. Turiello to Practice Pro Hac Vice and approving Designation of Local Counsel Charles W. Spann. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 6/12/07. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JW )
|
|
Filing
30
NOTICE of Corrected Image/Document re 28 VERIFIED PETITION for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice and DESIGNATION of Local Counsel submitted by attorney Priya K. Jesani, (Filing fee $ 175 receipt number 581181) by Defendants Menu Foods, Inc., Menu Foods Income Fund. (Service of corrected image is attached). (Spann, Charles)
|
|
Filing
29
VERIFIED PETITION for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice and DESIGNATION of Local Counsel submitted by attorney Edward B. Ruff, (Filing fee $ 175 receipt number 581185) by Defendants Menu Foods, Inc., Menu Foods Income Fund. (Spann, Charles)
|
|
Filing
26
Copy of Response to Mtn for Transfer to District of NJ submitted in MDL 1850. (JW )
|
|
Filing
25
Copy of NOTICE of Presentation or Waiver of Oral Argument. (JW )
|
|
Filing
24
Copy of NOTICE of Presentation or Waiver of Oral Argument submitted in MDL 1850. (JW )
|
|
Filing
19
|
| Filing 16 |
|
Filing
17
Copy of NOTICE of Appearance as to attorney Daniel L. Rottinghaus submitted in the MDL case 1850. (JW )
|
|
Filing
18
NOTICE - Other: BEFORE THE JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION: MDL DOCKET 1850: Plaintiff's Notice of Joinder and Joinder in Motion for Transfer of Actions to the Central District of California and for Cosolidated or Coordinated Pretrial Proceedings Pursuant to 12 USC 1407. (DRM, )
|
|
Filing
11
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Plaintiff Marion Streczyn, Defendant Menu Foods, Inc.. Menu Foods, Inc. served on 4/20/2007, answer due 5/10/2007. (O'Mara, Brian)
|
|
Filing
12
NOTICE other - Letter from Bruce Newman of Newman Creed & Assoc of Bristol, CT, addressed to clerk of MDL Panel re corrections to Panel Attorney Service List attached. (DRM, )
|
|
Filing
7
MOTION to Stay Proceedings by Defendants Menu Foods, Inc., Menu Foods Income Fund. (Spann, Charles)
|
|
Filing
5
CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties by Plaintiff Marion Streczyn. (O'Mara, Brian) Modified on 4/16/2007 (WJ) (no interested parties)
|
|
Filing
3
SUMMONS Issued as to Menu Foods Income Fund. (DRM, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
