Ingebretsen v. Palmer
Petitioner: John Ingebretsen
Respondent: Jack Palmer
Case Number: 3:2007cv00251
Filed: August 3, 2007
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Reno Office
County: Pershing
Presiding Judge: Larry R. Hicks
Presiding Judge: Robert A. McQuaid
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 9, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 116 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 109 Motion to Dismiss, dismissing Grounds 1, 3-5, and 7. Respondents to answer remaining claims within 45 days; Petitioner to reply within 30 days thereafter. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 9/8/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
October 7, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 104 ORDERED that P's # 101 Motion to lift the stay is GRANTED. This action is REINSTATED. FURTHER ORD answer/response to # 87 Third amended petition due by 11/21/2014; reply due 45 days after service of answer. FURTHER ORD the # 102 Exhibits fil ed in shall be considered as additional exhibits to the # 87 Third amended petition. FURTHER ORD that, from this date forward, the hard copy of any exhibits shall be forwarded to the staff attorneys in Las Vegas. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 10/6/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
January 19, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 97 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's 89 motion for issuance of stay and abeyance is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED, this action is STAYED pending exhaustion of the unexhausted claims. Petitioner shall return to this court wit h a motion to reopen within sixty (60) days of issuance of the remittitur by the Nevada Supreme Court at the conclusion of the state court proceedings. Further, petitioner or respondents otherwise may move to reopen the matter and seek any relief ap propriate under the circumstances. FURTHER ORDERED the clerk shall administratively close this action until such time as the court grants a motion to reopen the matter. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 1/15/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO)
September 22, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 86 ORDER GRANTING in part P's # 65 Motion for reconsideration. Ground 5 is REINSTATED. FURTHER ORDERED that P's # 79 Motion to amend second amended petition is GRANTED. P's third amended petition due by 9/29/2010. FURTHER ORDERED that P's # 80 Motion to expand record is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that P shall have until 10/22/2010 to file a motion for dismissal without prejudice of the entire petition, for partial dismissal of grounds 1, 2, 3, and 4, or for other appropriate relief. Within ten (10) days of filing such motion, P must file a signed declaration under penalty of perjury pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746 that he has conferred with his counsel in this matter regarding his options, that he has read the motion, and that he has authorized that the relief sought therein be requested. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 9/21/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
April 26, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 77 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that P's 76 unopposed motion for enlargement of time in which to file a reply to the opposition to motion for reconsideration (second request) is GRANTED. P shall have through May 10, 2010 to file and serve a reply to Rs' 72 opposition to motion for reconsideration. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 4/23/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PM)
March 3, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 71 ORDER granting 70 respondents' unopposed Motion to Extend Time to respond to 65 petitioner's MOTION for District Judge to Reconsider Order re 63 Order on Motion to Dismiss. ( Responses due by 3/4/2010.) Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 3/2/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SL)
January 31, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 69 ORDER granting 68 respondents' unopposed Motion to Extend Time to respond to 65 MOTION for District Judge to Reconsider Order re 63 Order on Motion to Dismiss. ( Responses due by 2/25/2010.) Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 1/28/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SL)
January 14, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 67 ORDER granting 66 petitioner's Motion to Extend Time to respond to Court Order. Petitioner need not file a response to the court's order 63 until the court has ruled upon 65 petitioner's MOTION for District Judge to Reconsider Order re 63 Order on Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 1/13/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SL)
December 10, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 64 Attached PDF is a Duplicate Order of 63 . Entry Modified on 12/11/2009 to reflect duplicate order and to Regenerated NEF. (BLG).
November 12, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 59 ORDER granting 58 respondents' Motion to Extend Time to file and serve a reply to 50 MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Petition. ( Replies due by 11/12/2009.) Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 11/10/09. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SL)
October 5, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER granting 56 respondents' Motion to Extend Time to file and serve a reply to 50 MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Petition. ( Reply due by 11/5/2009.) Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 10/5/09. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SL)
August 28, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 54 ORDER granting 53 petitioner's Motion to Extend Time to respond to 50 respondents' MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Petition ( Responses due by 9/18/2009.) Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 8/27/09. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SL)
July 29, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER granting 51 petitioner's Motion to Extend Time to respond to 50 respondents' MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Petition. ( Response due by 8/28/2009.) Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 7/28/09. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SL)
June 17, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 49 ORDER granting 48 respondents' Motion to Extend Time to file and serve an answer or other response to 44 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. ( Responses due by 7/15/2009.) Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 6/17/09. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SL)
May 5, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER granting 46 Respondents' notion to extend time to file and serve an answer or other response to 44 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. ( Responses due by 6/15/2009.) Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 5/4/09. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SL)
March 16, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER granting 37 Petitioner's Motion to Amend/Correct First Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Petitioner shall file and serve the Second Amended Petition within 10 days from the date of entry of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondents shall have 45 days from the date of service of the Second Amended Petition to answer, or otherwise plead to, the Second Amended Petition. If Respndents file and serve an answer, they shall comply with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing S ec. 2254 Cases in the U.S. District Courts and Petitioner shall have 45 days from the date on which the answer is served to file a reply. ( Amended Petition due by 3/26/2009.) Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 3/16/09. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SL)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ingebretsen v. Palmer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: John Ingebretsen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jack Palmer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?