Browne v. McDaniel et al
| Jason Evan Browne |
| E. K. McDaniel and Nevada Attorney General |
| 3:2007cv00290 |
| June 27, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| Washoe |
| Robert A. McQuaid |
| Brian E. Sandoval |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
54
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that respondents' Motion to Substitute Party RENEE BAKER for and in place of E.K. McDANIEL as Warden of Ely State Prison in this action is GRANTED. Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 7/6/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)
|
|
Filing
48
JUDGMENT. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus 19 is DENIED IN ITS ENTIRETY. FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner is DENIED A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. Signed by Clerk of Court, Lance S. Wilson on 10/21/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus 19 is DENIED IN ITS ENTIRETY. FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner is DENIED A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 10/19/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
