Rhymes v. Palmer et al
| Michael Rhymes |
| Nevada Attorney General and Jack Palmer |
| 3:2007cv00302 |
| July 5, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| Pershing |
| Valerie P. Cooke |
| Robert C. Jones |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
ORDERED that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED IN ITS ENTIRETY. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner is DENIED A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT ACCORDINGLY. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 5/3/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that petitioner's 27 motion for reconsideration is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that the dismissal order and judgment 22 23 are VACATED. FURTHER ORDERED that the Court's order on the merits of the petition will be issued in due course. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 11/29/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall ENTER JUDGMENT accordingly. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 10/19/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
