O'Guinn v. Nevada Department Of Corrections et al
| Roy Alan O'Guinn |
| Nevada Department Of Corrections, State Of Nevada, Lovelock Correctional Center and Director Mental Health Dept of N.D.O.C. |
| 3:2007cv00450 |
| October 31, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| Washoe |
| Valerie P. Cooke |
| Larry R. Hicks |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
96
ORDER granting 77 Motion to Seal; and granting 87 Motion to Seal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke on 11/10/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DN)
|
|
Filing
95
ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's # 85 Report and Recommendation) entered on August 26, 2010, is adopted and accepted, and D's # 74 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, and that P's remaining claim for breach of contract is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. IT IS THEREFORE FURTHER ORDERED that P's # 75 Motion for Summary Judgment, or in the Alternative Partial Summary Judgment is DENIED. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 10/29/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
80
ORDER GRANTING Ds' 73 Motion to Seal, and P's 76 Motion to Seal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke on 5/25/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
