Hadley v. McDaniel et al
| Ryan E. Hadley |
| E. K. McDaniel and Nevada Attorney General |
| 3:2007cv00529 |
| November 6, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| Washoe |
| Valerie P. Cooke |
| Brian E. Sandoval |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
56
JUDGMENT. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the limited claims in the petition which are cognizable on habeas are DISMISSED with prejudice as meritless. FURTHER ORDERED that all remaining claims are DISMISSED without prejudice. FURTHER ORDERED that respondents' motion for summary judgment is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by Lance S. Wilson on 07/15/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the limited claims in this petition which arecognizable on habeas are DISMISSED with prejudice as meritless.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all remaining claims in this action are DISMISSEDwithout prejudice to petition ers right to bring these claims in an appropriate civil rights action pursuant to 42:1983. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents motion for summary judgment 38 is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly and close this case. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 07/14/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER granting nunc pro tunc 44 respondents' Motion to Extend Time to reply to 38 MOTION for Summary Judgment 12/17/2009. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 1/8/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SL)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER granting 42 respondents' Motion to Extend Time to reply to 38 MOTION for Summary Judgment. ( Replies due by 12/3/2009.) Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 11/5/09. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SL)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER granting 34 respondents' Motion to Extend Time to file and serve a motion for summary judgment in compliance with 25 Order. ( Motions due up to and including 9/18/2009.) Petitioner may file an opposition to respondents' motion within 30 days of the date of service of respondents' motion as set out on pages 6-7 of Order 25 . Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 9/2/09. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SL)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER granting 30 respondents' Motion to Extend Time up to and including 08/28/2009, to file a motion for summary judgment in compliance with 25 Order. Petitioner may file an opposition to respondents' motion within 30 days of the date of service of respondents' motion. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 7/15/09. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SL)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER granting 26 respondents' Motion to Extend Time to file a motion for summary judgment as per prior 25 Order. Petitioner may mail an opposition for filing w/i 30 days of service of respondents' motion as per provisions on pages 6-7 of prior order 25 . ( Motion for Summary Judgment due by 6/1/2009.) Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 4/20/09. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SL)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER denying 16 respondents' Motion to Dismiss. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within 60 days of entry of this order, respondents shall file a mot for summary judgment that fully complies w/all requirements outlined at pages 5-6 of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner may mail an opposition to the mot for summary judgment to the Clerk for filing w/i 30 days of service of the motion. See order re specifics for response re competent evidence, response deadline and all exhibits. ( Motion due by 4/20/2009.) Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 2/17/09. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
