Crowley v. Palmer et al
| John Crowley |
| Jack Palmer and Nevada Attorney General |
| 3:2007cv00568 |
| April 8, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Habeas Corpus (General) Office |
| Washoe |
| Valerie P. Cooke |
| Larry R. Hicks |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
JUDGMENT. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by Clerk of Court, Lance S. Wilson on 11/5/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 9 respondents' Motion to Dismiss. The court finds that grounds 1(b), 2, 4, and 5 are unexhausted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no later than 02/23/2009, petitioner shall do one of the following: 1) f ile & serve a Notice of Abandonment of Claims, stating that he wishes to abandon grounds 1(b), 2, 4, and 5, and proceed only on grounds 1(a), 1(c) & 3; or 2) file & serve a motion for stay, requesting a stay of this action, & attempting to make the r equired showing for such a stay, pursuant to Rhines v Weber, 544 U.S. 269 (2005), so that he may return to state court & exhaust his unexhausted claims. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if petitioner files & serves a motion for stay, respondents shall hav e 30 days to respond to such motion & petitioner shall thereafter have 30 days to reply. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if petitioner files & serves a notice of abandonment of claims, respondents shall have 30 days to file an answer, responding to grounds 1(a), 1(c) and 3, & petitioner shall thereafter have 30 days to file a reply. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 1/29/09. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
