Duramed Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Watson Laboratories, Inc. et al
Duramed Pharmaceuticals, Inc. |
Watson Laboratories, Inc. and Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc. |
3:2008cv00116 |
March 6, 2008 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Reno Office |
Washoe |
Larry R. Hicks |
Robert A. McQuaid |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 382 ORDER DISMISSING CASE. IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's request to stay 381 is GRANTED. This action is STAYED during the pendency of the appeal of the New Jersey judgment. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall inform the court upon comp letion of the appeal within ten (10) days of the issuance of the mandate resolving the appeal and file a copy of the appellate decision and mandate with the court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant's motion for summary judgment on the issue of obviousness 335 and motion for summary judgment for collateral estoppel 376 are DENIED without prejudice. The hearing on defendants' motions, currently scheduled for Thursday, August 9, 2012, at 1:30 p.m. is VACATED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of court shall administratively close this action until further order by the court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 7/25/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC) |
Filing 373 ORDERED that P's # 350 Motion to strike is GRANTED in-part and DENIED in-part in accordance with this order. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 5/17/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
Filing 356 ORDER. It is hereby ORDERED that Watson Laboratories, Inc.s 355 Motion is GRANTED and it is further ORDERED that Watson may file a reply brief in support of its Motion for Summary Judgment Re Obviousness up to 30-pages and the reply brief and its Opposition to the Motion to Strike shall be due 1/6/2012. (Responses due by 1/6/2012. Replies due by 1/6/2012.) Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 12/21/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC) |
Filing 319 ORDER GRANTING P's 308 Motion to file an amended Complaint. Clerk shall file the attached amended complaint (Doc # 308 , Exhibit 1). FURTHER ORD GRANTING D's 309 Motion for leave to file a motion for summary judgment. D 's motion for summary judgment due by 11/19/2011. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 9/19/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
Filing 313 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's 248 motion for leave to seal motion for status conference, 253 motion for leave to seal reply to motion for status conference, 262 motion for leave to seal motion for preliminary injunction, and 283 motion for leave to seal reply to motion for a preliminary injunction are GRANTED. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 8/25/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO) |
Filing 307 ORDER GRANTING P's 306 Motion to Seal. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 7/18/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
Filing 301 ORDER DENYING P's # 297 Emergency Notice of Motion and Motion for a Temporary Injunction Pending Appeal. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 6/17/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
Filing 295 ORDER denying 260 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. See order for specifics. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 6/16/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EM) |
Filing 222 FINAL JUDGMENT ORDER : ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Judgment be entered in favor of Duramed and against Watson on Duramed's claim for acts of infringement of the '969 patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271; and it is further ORDERED AND AD JUDGED that Judgment be entered for Duramed and against Watson on all of Watson's counterclaims alleging non-infringement and invalidity of claims of the '969 patent; and it is further ORDERED that, under 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(4)(A), the effective date of any approval of Watson's ANDA No. 78-834 be the date of expiration of the '969 patent; the foregoing not preventing the FDA from reviewing, processing and giving tentative, but not final, approval of the ANDA includin g during the pendency of any appeal; and it is further ORDERED that, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(4)(B), Watson and its affiliates, their respective officers, agents, servants, employees and attorneys, and those persons in active concert or participation with them are permanently enjoined from engaging in the manufacture, use, offer to sell, or sale within the United States, or importation into the United States, of any product covered by, or the use of which is covered by, the '969 patent for the term of that patent, except as provided in 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(1). Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 4/26/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
Filing 214 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's 175 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's 177 Motion to Exclude is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 03/31/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC) |
Filing 185 ORDER granting 184 defendant's unopposed Motion to Extend Time to respond to 175 plaintiff's MOTION for Summary Judgment, 176 plaintiff's SEALED MOTION for Summary Judgment, 177 plaintiff's M OTION to Exclude Expert Opinions of Dr. Michael A. Thomas, 178 plaintiff's SEALED MOTION to Exclude Expert Opinions of Dr. Michael A. Thomas. ( Responses due by 9/10/2009.) Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 9/2/09. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SL) |
Filing 125 ORDER granting 122 Motion to Seal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert A. McQuaid, Jr. on 5/27/2009. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HJ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.