Dougherty et al v. MCDANIEL et al
| Elizabeth Ann Dougherty, Patrick James Cavanaugh, Jr., Aiki Cavanaugh and Patrick James Cavanaugh |
| E.K. MCDANIEL, Debra Brooks, Adam Endel, Theodore D'Amico, Robert Bannister, Steven MacArthur, Max Carter and Nevada Department Of Corrections |
| 3:2008cv00192 |
| April 9, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| White Pine |
| Brian E. Sandoval |
| Robert A. McQuaid |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
75
ORDER Re: 74 Proposed Order. IT IS ORDERED that defendants shall tender the settlement payment check to plaintiffs, who shall deposit the funds in the client trust account. The settlement funds shall not be removed from plaintiffs' trust ac count until the state probate court with jurisdiction over the estate of decedent Patrick J. Cavanaugh, Sr. shall issue an order approving the settlement, by the duly appointed administrator or personal representative of said estate, of the claim of said estate asserted in this action, and further until said order of said probate court shall be presented to and approved by counsel for defendants. Upon approval of the compromise and settlement of the claim of the estate by probate court, plaintiffs' may remove the settlement funds. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 2/2/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
