Hartford Fire Insurance Company v. Universal Import, LLC et al
Hartford Fire Insurance Company |
James P. Shoen and Universal Import, LLC |
3:2008cv00271 |
May 21, 2008 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Contract: Other Office |
Clark |
Larry R. Hicks |
Robert A. McQuaid |
None |
Diversity |
28:1332 Diversity-Account Receivable |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 34 ORDER denying 18 Defendant Shoen's Motion to Dismiss; and granting in part, as to Defendant Universal, as described in order and denying in part, without prejudice, as to Defendant Shoen 22 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Universal will deposit with Plaintiff the amount of $50,000 as a reserve to be used by Plaintiff against future losses stemming from Plaintiff's payment of the outstanding duties. See order re specifics. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 11/19/09. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SL) |
Filing 27 ORDER APPROVING 26 parties' Stipulation for an extension of time for Defendants to reply to 18 MOTION to Dismiss For Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can be Granted and to respond to 22 plaintiff's CounterMOTION for Summary Judgment on Hartford's Claim for Specific Performance. ( Response to plaintiff's countermotion for summary judgment due by 7/1/2009, and Reply to motion to dismiss due by 7/1/2009.) Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 6/18/09. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SL) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.