Diamond State Ins. Co.vs Genesis Ins. Co et al
Diamond State Ins. Co. |
Genesis Ins. Co., Washoe County School District, Mavis Leathley, Ann Laurel Warren, Mike Corkery, Marylin Meline, Menicucci, Vasquel and Moore |
3:2008cv00296 |
May 29, 2008 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Insurance Office |
Washoe |
Robert A. McQuaid |
Larry R. Hicks |
Plaintiff |
Diversity |
28:2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance) |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 57 ORDER denying 55 plaintiff's Motion for New Trial and denying defendant's request for sanctions contained within 56 its Response to Motion. See order re specifics. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 7/14/09. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SL) |
Filing 50 VACATED PER 51 ORDER - JUDGMENT that, THE COURT, having considered the motion of plaintiff Diamond State Insurance Company to dismiss this action without prejudice under Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(2) following execution of a settlement agreement by all parties calling for dismissal of this action, and upon consideration of any opposition to the motion, HEREBY GRANTS Diamond State's motion and ORDERS that this action is dismissed without prejudice under Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(2), each party to bear its own costs. Signed by Lance S. Wilson on 2/5/2009. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KL) Modified on 2/5/2009 to vacate judgment (KL). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.