Padilla v. The State of Nevada, in rel, The Nevada Department of Corrections et al
Raymond Padilla |
State of Nevada, Kenny Guinn, Jim Gibbons, Glen Whorton, Howard Skolnik, E. K. McDaniel, Adam Endel, Debra Brooks, Michael Oxborrow and Harry Peltzer |
3:2008cv00410 |
July 25, 2008 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Reno Office |
Clark |
Larry R. Hicks |
Robert A. McQuaid |
None |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 100 ORDERED that the # 99 Report and Recommendation is adopted and accepted, and Ds' # 59 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. FURTHER ORD P's # 71 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 11/28/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
Filing 72 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb, on 12/6/2011 : P's # 62 Motion to Compel is DENIED. P's # 63 Motion for Leave to serve additional discovery is DENIED. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
Filing 68 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the 61 Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation entered on September 30, 2011, is adopted and accepted, and Plaintiff's 48 Motions for Permanent Restraining Order and 49 Preliminary Injunction are DENIED. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 11/17/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO) |
Filing 52 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation 46 is adopted and accepted. FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 37 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The claims against the State of N evada and NDOC are DISMISSED with prejudice; The claims asserted against Defendants under 42:1983 in their official capacities with respect to damages are DISMISSED with prejudice; Plaintiff's claim that Defendants violated his rights under the Equal Protection Clause is DISMISSED with prejudice; The claims asserted against Defendants Guinn, Gibbons, Masto, Miller, Whorton, Crawford, Skolnik, Cox, Irvin, Oxborrow, Weiss, Drain, and Peltzer are DISMISSED with prejudice; The mot ion to dismiss on the ground of claim preclusion is DENIED; The motion to dismiss on the ground of qualified immunity is DENIED; and Defendants McDaniel, Brooks, Endel, DAmico, and Bannister are ordered to answer Plaintiff's Amended Complain t within fourteen (14) days after the entry of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order 31 and Motion for Preliminary Injunction 32 are DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 7/12/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC) |
Filing 45 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Robert A. McQuaid, Jr, on 4/18/2011. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs's 43 Motion to Allow Discovery is DENIED. In this district, discovery in inmate litigation does not commence until the court has issued a Scheduling Order allowing discovery to commence. No such Scheduling Order as been issued in this case. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO) |
Filing 21 ORDER ADOPTING AND ACCEPTING 19 Report and Recommendation and granting without prejudice and with leave to amend 13 defendants' MOTION to Dismiss and denying as moot 12 plaintiff's MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and Restraining Order. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 11/19/09. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SL) |
Filing 19 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE re 12 Motion for Preliminary Injunction and 13 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that the District Judge enter an order GRANTING Defendants' Motion to Dismiss wit hout prejudice and with leave to amend. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that the District Judge enter an order DENYING AS MOOT Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Objections to R&R due by 11/6/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert A. McQuaid, Jr. on 10/21/2009. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HJ). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.