Cox v. Benedetti et al
Steve Michael Cox |
James Benedetti, Tony Corda, John Peery, Joe Brackbill, Robert Bannister, Greg Cox, Don Helling, Lori Bagwell, Michael Brown, Dave Carroll and David Vest |
3:2008cv00502 |
September 17, 2008 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
Carson City |
Valerie P. Cooke |
Larry R. Hicks |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 111 ORDER granting in part 58 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 93 Motion to Strike ; denying 97 Motion for Sanctions re Discovery; dismissing with prejudice plaintiff's 14th Amendment claim; adopting Report and Recommendations re 105 Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 9/14/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LG) |
Filing 104 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke, on 7/29/2011 GRANTING P's 94 Motion for copies. FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk's office shall mail P copies of docket numbers 95, 95-1, 95-2, 95-3, 95-4 within one day of the date of this order. ( specified docs mailed to P 7/29/2011 ) (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
Filing 75 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke, on 4/5/2011 : P's # 73 pleading is construed as a motion and is GRANTED; and motions # 66 and # 67 are hereby deemed WITHDRAWN. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
Filing 72 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke, on 3/29/2011. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the 60 motion for clarification is DENIED. The court's 48 order is clear on its face and only applies as follows: Steve Michael Cox shall be provided any and all ambulatory assistance necessary to ensure Mr. Cox's timely attendance to all his scheduled hearing with this Court. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO) |
Filing 43 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke, on 11/3/2010. By Deputy Clerk: Lisa Mann. Plaintiff's Motion to Hold Proceedings in Abeyance 41 is DENIED. Defendants' Motion for Leave to Take Depositi on of plaintiff 42 is GRANTED. The deposition shall be conducted either in person at the place of confinement or telephonically. Following the depositions, defendants shall provide a copy of the deposition transcript to the plaintiff. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC) |
Filing 40 ORDER denying 38 Motion to Stay. Signed by Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke on 10/20/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DN) |
Filing 32 ORDER GRANTING in part P's 28 Motion to Stay. This case shall be STAYED until P has access to his legal papers. P and Ds shall file status reports on FRIDAY, September 17, 2010 , or as soon as P has access to his legal papers , whichever comes first. P's # 28 alternative motion for appointmenet of counsel is DENIED. Ds' # 30 motion to take depostion is DENIED without prejudice. Ds may renew this motion after P has regained access tohis legal papers.; denying 30 Motion to Take Deposition. Signed by Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke on 9/7/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
Filing 26 ORDER DENYING as moot P's 23 Motion to hold in abeyance. The # 12 Scheduling order shall remain in full force and effect. Signed by Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke on 7/21/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.