Jones v. McDaniel et al
Plaintiff: Christopher A. Jones
Defendant: E. K. McDaniel and R. Chambliss
Case Number: 3:2008cv00537
Filed: October 2, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Prisoner: Civil Rights Office
County: White Pine
Presiding Judge:
Presiding Judge: Valerie P. Cooke
Presiding Judge: Larry R. Hicks
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 2, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 134 ORDERED that Jones' # 129 Motion to Address Residual Costs is GRANTED in part. Defendants shall deposit the remaining $384.51 to which Jones is entitled into his account, but the Court declines to order Defendants to deposit this sum into any particular account. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 11/2/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
February 8, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 115 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that P's 87 -1 Bill of Costs is deemed FILED and Ds' 94 response thereto is deemed timely filed. FURTH ORD that P's 87 -1 Bill of Costs be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. P is entitled to $278. 36 in costs. P's Bill of Costs is DENIED in all other respects. FURTH ORD that P's 90 Emergency Motion for Order is DENIED. Ds are to pay P all monies due in the lawsuit in accordance with the order set forth above. FURTH ORD that P' ;s 101 Motion to Strike Ds' Errata is DENIED. FURTH ORD that P's 102 Motion for Leave to Supplement Costs is DENIED. FURTH ORD that P's 103 Motino for Sanctions is DENIED. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 2/5/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PM)
September 22, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 110 ORDER - plaintiff's Bill of Costs is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff's Bill of Costs [87-1] is deemed filed and defendants' response thereto 94 is deemed timely filed. Plaintiff's Bill of Costs is granted in par t and denied in part. Plaintiff is entitled to $278.36 in costs. Plaintiff's bill of costs is denied all other respects. Plaintiff's emergency motion for order 90 is denied. Plaintiff's motion to strike errata 101 is denied. Plaintiff's motion for leave to supplement costs 102 is denied. Plaintiff's motion for sanctions 103 is denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke on 9/22/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DN)
July 29, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 96 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 87 Motion for pre and postjudgment interest. Plaintiff's motion is denied as to prejudgment interest and granted as to postjudgment interest in the amount of $.08 per day from the entry of judgment until payment is made in full. Signed by Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke on 7/29/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DN)
March 3, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 69 ORDER discharging 60 the order to show cause; denying 61 plaintiff's Motion for District Judge to Reconsider Order 60 ; denying 51 plaintiff's Request for Review of Magistrate Judge Decision re 47 Order, and denying without prejud ice 17 plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's reply to 42 MOTION for Sanctions is due 14 days from the entry of this order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for entry of a scheduling order. See order for specifics. ( Reply re 42 motion for sanctions is due by 3/17/2010.) Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 3/3/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SL)
September 3, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER sustaining Magistrate Judge's Order 18 and denying 21 plaintiff's Objection to Document; granting 19 defendants' Motion to Extend Time to respond to 16 plaintiff's MOTION for District Judge to Reconsider Order 14 until after the Early Mediation Conference. ( Response due by 9/30/2009.) Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 9/2/09. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SL)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jones v. McDaniel et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher A. Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: E. K. McDaniel
Represented By: Heather D. Procter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: R. Chambliss
Represented By: Heather D. Procter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?