Nelson v. City of Reno, et al
| Robert W. Nelson |
| Reno, City Of, Reno Police Dept., Henry Sotelo and Char McMillin |
| 3:2008cv00587 |
| December 15, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| Washoe |
| Larry R. Hicks |
| Robert A. McQuaid |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
JUDGMENT - Ds' motion to dismiss (#10) is GRANTED. The complaint is dismissed without prejudice as to defendants City of Reno, Reno Police Department, and Char McMillin. Signed by Lance S. Wilson on 11/24/2009. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER GRANTING Ds' 10 Motion to Dismiss. The complaint is dismissed without prejudice as to Ds City of Reno, Reno Police Department, and Char McMillin. FURTHER ORD clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 11/20/2009. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
27
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE re 26 failure to effect service as to Defendant Henry Sotelo. IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that the District Judge enter an Order DISMISSING Defendant Henry Sotelo without prejudice for failure to effect timely service on this Defendant. Objections to R&R due by 8/20/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert A. McQuaid, Jr. on 8/4/2009. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HJ)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
