ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY v. Silver Sage Insurance Brokers et al
| ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY |
| Silver Sage Insurance Brokers, Joan Page and John Stoker |
| 3:2009cv00433 |
| August 6, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| Clark |
| Robert A. McQuaid |
| Edward C. Reed |
| Plaintiff |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
53
ORDERED that the motion for attorney's fees (# 50 ) is GRANTED in the requested amount of $66,433.50. Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 8/8/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) Modified on 8/8/2012 to add hyperlink (DRM).
|
|
Filing
35
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr, on 12/23/2010. IT IS ORDERED that P's 33 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED as to the following claims in the complaint: the Fourth Claim, Respondeat Superior, ag ainst Silver Sage; the Fifth Claim, Unjust Enrichment, against Silver Sage and John Stoker; the Seventh Claim, Indemnity and Contribution, against Silver Sage and John Stoker; and the Eighth Claim, Equitable Subrogation, against Silver Sage and John Stoker. Judgment may not be entered in this action until all claims as to all parties have been disposed of. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
