Garver v. Washoe County et al
Kory Garver |
Washoe County, Julia Bower, Piaute-Shoshone Tribal Police, Washoe County Child Protective Services, Washoe County Department of Social Services. and Washoe County Sheriff |
3:2009cv00463 |
August 19, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Reno Office |
Washoe |
Larry R. Hicks |
Robert A. McQuaid |
Plaintiff |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 99 ORDER granting Plaintiff's 95 Petition for Compromise of a Minor's Claim; approving the settlement between Plaintiff and Washoe County (see order for details and further filing requirements). Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 3/12/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR) |
Filing 57 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Washoe County 's 44 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. FURTHER ORDERED, Defendants Negron and Brandt's 45 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERE D, Plaintiff's 46 Cross Motion for Summary Judgment on Liability is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED, Defendants Negron and Brandt's 51 Motion to Strike is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED, the parties shall lodge their proposed joint pretrial order within thirty (30) days from entry of this Order. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 11/28/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.