Youngren v. Ownit Mortgage Solutions, Inc., a California corporation et al
Plaintiff: Grant Matthew Youngren
Defendant: Ownit Mortgage Solutions, Inc., a California corporation, First Magnus Financial Corporation/Charter Funding, Litton Loan Sergicing, LP, a Delaware Limited Partnership, Amy Blazer, Merscorp, Inc., a Virginia corporation and MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEM, INC., a subsidiary of MERSCORP, INC. a Delaware corporation
Case Number: 3:2009cv00595
Filed: October 5, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Reno Office
County: Washoe
Presiding Judge:
Presiding Judge: Robert A. McQuaid
Presiding Judge: Edward C. Reed
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 Truth in Lending
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 89 ORDER - This case will now be closed administratively. The parties shall request the court to reopen the case if and when the MDL remands further claims; together with an updated joint status report. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 8/14/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
March 21, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 76 CERTIFIED COPY OF AMENDED MDL ORDER OF REMAND - MDL Docket No. 09-2119-JAT : Motions to Remand Certain Claims are granted as follows: Claims 7-10 and part of claims 1-5, and 14 remain with the undersigned as part of the MDL and claim 6 and pa rt of claims 1-5 and 14 have been remanded to the transferor court. No claim against Litton Loan Servicing LP is remanded. ( see order for additional specifics ) Signed by MDL Judge James A. Teilborg on 3/21/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
March 6, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 59 ORDER granting 48 defendants' Motion to Stay pending a decision of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all proceedings in this case are stayed pending Judge Teilborg's order to remand defendants and claims back to this court. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 3/5/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SL)
January 19, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER denying 4 plaintiff's Motion to Remand to State Court; and denying as moot 10 plaintiff's Motion to Stay. See order re specifics. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 1/14/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SL)
November 12, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER APPROVING 30 parties' Stipulation for Defendants Merscorp, Inc. and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. to have up to and including 60 days from entry of this order to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint or 10 days f rom the resolution of Plaintiff's 3 motion to remand to state court and the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation's determination as to whether this case will be transferred to the MDL 25 should these events occur before the expiration of the 60-day period. ( Answer or other response by Ds MERS due by 1/11/2010.) Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 11/10/09. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SL)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Youngren v. Ownit Mortgage Solutions, Inc., a California corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Grant Matthew Youngren
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ownit Mortgage Solutions, Inc., a California corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: First Magnus Financial Corporation/Charter Funding
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Litton Loan Sergicing, LP, a Delaware Limited Partnership
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Amy Blazer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Merscorp, Inc., a Virginia corporation
Represented By: Erica J Stutman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEM, INC., a subsidiary of MERSCORP, INC. a Delaware corporation
Represented By: Erica J Stutman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?