Montalvo v. United States of America
| 3:2009cv00604 |
| February 9, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| Valerie P. Cooke |
| Larry R. Hicks |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
ORDER denying 11 Motion for Certificate of Appealability. See order for specifics. E-mail notice (NEF) sent to the US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 4/5/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EM)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER granting petitioner leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner shall have 30 days from date of entry of this order to file a motion for Certificate of Appealability that complies with the court's instructions. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if petitioner fails to comply with this order, this court may deny him a certificate of appealability. See order re specifics. ( Motion for Certificate of Appealability due by 4/2/2010.) Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 3/2/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Montalvo v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
