Wilcox v. Palmer et al

Wilcox v. Palmer et al

Case Number:	3:2009cv00621
Filed:	October 22, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office:	Habeas Corpus (General) Office
Presiding Judge:
Presiding Judge:	Valerie P. Cooke
Presiding Judge:	Robert C. Jones
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:	28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 27, 2010	Filing 15 JUDGMENT. IT IS ORDERED that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus, as amended, shall be DENIED on the merits and this action shall be DISMISSED with prejudice. FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED, as jurists of reason would not find debatable or wrong this Court's holding that the Nevada Supreme Court's rejection of the claim was neither contrary to nor an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law. Judgment is entered in favor of respondents and against petitioner, dismissing this action with prejudice. Signed by Clerk of Court, Lance S. Wilson on 10/27/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)
October 26, 2010	Filing 14 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus, as amended, shall be DENIED on the merits and this action shall be DISMISSED with prejudice. FURTHER ORDERED that, while no motion for appointment of counsel has been filed as opposed 13 , any such motion is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED, as jurists of reason would not find debatable or wrong this Court's holding that the Nevada Supreme Court's rejection of t he claim was neither contrary to nor an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly, in favor of respondents and against petitioner, dismissing this action with prejudice. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 10/26/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 27, 2010

Filing 15 JUDGMENT. IT IS ORDERED that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus, as amended, shall be DENIED on the merits and this action shall be DISMISSED with prejudice. FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED, as jurists of reason would not find debatable or wrong this Court's holding that the Nevada Supreme Court's rejection of the claim was neither contrary to nor an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law. Judgment is entered in favor of respondents and against petitioner, dismissing this action with prejudice. Signed by Clerk of Court, Lance S. Wilson on 10/27/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)

October 26, 2010

Filing 14 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus, as amended, shall be DENIED on the merits and this action shall be DISMISSED with prejudice. FURTHER ORDERED that, while no motion for appointment of counsel has been filed as opposed 13 , any such motion is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED, as jurists of reason would not find debatable or wrong this Court's holding that the Nevada Supreme Court's rejection of t he claim was neither contrary to nor an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly, in favor of respondents and against petitioner, dismissing this action with prejudice. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 10/26/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wilcox v. Palmer et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?