Sieben et al v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. et al
Case Number: 3:2009cv00642
Filed: October 30, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Fraud or Truth-In-Lending Office
Presiding Judge: Valerie P. Cooke
Presiding Judge: Robert C. Jones
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 28, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the 7 Motion to Remand is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED, the 8 Motion to Stay is DENIED as moot. FURTHER ORDERED, the 6 and 27 Motions to Dismiss are GRANTED as to the first cause of action, GRANTED as to the third , fourth, and tenth through twelfth causes of action with respect to the non-MERS Defendants, and DENIED as to the remaining causes of action for lack of jurisdiction, as these currently remain with Judge Teilborg in Case No. 2:09-md-02119-JAT in the District of Arizona. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 10/28/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO)
April 21, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER STAYING CASE : All proceedings in this case are STAYED pending Judge Teilborg's (MDL) order to remand back to this Court. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 4/21/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sieben et al v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?