Ortega v. Williams et al
| 3:2009cv00646 |
| November 2, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Habeas Corpus (General) Office |
| Valerie P. Cooke |
| Robert C. Jones |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
ORDER that petitioner's motion to lift stay ECF No. 35 is GRANTED; Clerk directed to reopen the matter and then close this action pursuant to petitioner's notice of voluntary dismissal. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 2/11/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER GRANTING # 26 Motion for Stay. FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall CLOSE THIS CASE ADMINISTRATIVELY, BUT SHALL NOT ENTER JUDGMENT. FURTHER ORDERED that P must return to state court by 11/4/2010. FURTHER ORDERED that after he exhausts his sta te court remedies with respect to his unexhausted claims, petitioner may, within thirty (30) days of completion of his state action for collateral review, make a motion to reopen this action, under the same case number, and before the same undersigned United States District Court Judge. Should petitioner miss the deadlines imposed by this Order, the motion to reopen may be denied. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 9/20/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that cnsl for P shall meet with P as soon as reasonably possible, if cnsl has not already done so, to: (See order for specifics). FURTH ORD that P shall have 60 days to file and serve an amend pet for whc, which sh all include all known grounds for relief (both exhausted and unexhausted). Rs shall have 30 days after service of amend pet w/in which to answer/respond to the amend pet. If P does not file an amend pet, Rs shall have 30 days from the d ate on which the amend pet is due w/in which to answer/respond to P's original petition. FURTH ORD that if and when Rs file an answer, P shall have 30 days after service of the answer to file and serve a reply. FURTH ORD that cnsl for Rs shall make available to cnsl for P (photocopying costs at the latter's expense), as soon as reasonably possible, cps of whatever portions of the state court record they possess re the judgment P is challenging in this case. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 6/9/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PM)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER GRANTING 12 Motion for Reconsideration : Counsel shall be appointed to represent P. FURTHER ORD Clerk shall send FPD a cpy this Ord w cpy of petition f WHC and its attachments. ( Docs mailed to FPD 4/22/2010 ) FPD shall undertake representa tion or indicate inability to do so by 5/22/2010. FURTHER ORD Clerk shall RESUBMIT this case to the Court after FPD has appeared or indicated inability to represent P, or 30 days from entry of this Order, whichever comes first. FURTHER ORD after coun sel has appeared for P the court will issue a scheduling order. ( FPD's appearance/notice is due by 5/22/2010.) Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 4/21/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) Modified on 4/22/2010 to clarify due date (DRM).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ortega v. Williams et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
