Sage et al v. BNC Mortgage, Inc. et al
Case Number: 3:2009cv00689
Filed: November 19, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Real Property: Foreclosure Office
Presiding Judge: Valerie P. Cooke
Presiding Judge: Robert C. Jones
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 17, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 49 JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Renewed Motion to Dismiss Complaint Against T.D. Service Company (#30) is GRANTED in its entirety without leave to amend. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss by Defendant Cooper Castle Law Firm (#31) is GRANTED in its entirety without leave to amend. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court sua sponte DISMISSES all remaining defendants with prejudice and orders any lis pendens on the property expunged. Signed by Clerk of Court, Lance S. Wilson on 05/17/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
April 21, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER STAYING CASE : All proceedings in this case are STAYED pending Judge Teilborg's (MDL) order to remand back to this Court. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 4/21/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sage et al v. BNC Mortgage, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?