Libke, DDS v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage
| 3:2010cv00059 |
| January 29, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| Valerie P. Cooke |
| Robert C. Jones |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the 13 Motion to Dismiss, Plaintiff's 6 First Amended Complaint filed by Defendant Wells Fargo is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that the Notice of Pendency of Action recorded by Plaint iff against the real property described as 1720 Hunter Creek Road, Reno, Nevada, APN # 214-193-06, and recorded with the Washoe County Recorder on March 8, 2010, as document number 3857079 is hereby expunged and RELEASED IN FULL. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 1/14/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER GRANTING 8 MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION re 17 Proposed Order. Injunction shall remain in place for 90 days beginning on March 25, 2010. ( See pdf order for additional specifics ) Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 6/28/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Libke, DDS v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
