Lisle v. McDaniel et al
| 3:2010cv00064 |
| February 1, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| Valerie P. Cooke |
| Larry R. Hicks |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
141
ORDER adopting and accepting 139 Report and Recommendation; denying 132 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 09/13/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
|
Filing
126
ORDER adopting and accepting 119 Report and Recommendation and granting in part and denying in part 95 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff's motion to stay and abeyance 121 and motion for extraordinary circumstances to i nclude material 123 are denied as moot. The court will allow Defendants 45 days to file supplementary motion for summary judgment to respond to issues identified by Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff shall have 30 days to respond; defendants shall have 15 days to reply. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 11/30/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
|
|
Filing
115
ORDER GRANTING 79 Motion to Strike : P's 72 MOTION is STRICKEN. Signed by Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke on 5/2/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER - Defendants failed to file a motion to dismiss pursuant to the court's order 36 . Therefore, the defendants shall file an answer on or before Friday, January 27, 2012. Plaintiff's motions 66 & 67 are denied as moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke on 1/11/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DN)
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO RULE 4(m) FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURES. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the above-entitled action be, and hereby is, dismissed without prejudice as to: Daniel M. Seaton. Daniel M. Seaton terminated. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 11/16/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER DENYING 41 Motion for service and 42 Motion for exception to PLRA exhaustion requirement. Signed by Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke on 9/1/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER DENYING 43 Motion for reconsideration. Signed by Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke on 8/22/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
30
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke, on 3/1/2011. By Deputy Clerk: Lisa Mann. The Court has reviewed plaintiff's motion for a docket status check 26 . An Inmate EarlyMediation Conference is set for 3/22/2011 at 9:00 a.m. 27 . (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's 13 motion adding individual capacity is GRANTED. Defendants McDaniel, Neven, Donat, Zoe Waggener, Hebert, Drain, Endel, Kerr, Seaton, Brooks, Baker, Peltzer, Cox, Chambliss, Darren Waggener , Remington, and Oxborrow are sued in their individual capacities on the due process claim based plaintiff's continued High Risk Potential (HRP) classification and his indeterminate confinement in the Condemned Men's Unit (CMU). Additional ly, defendant Darren Waggener is sued in his individual capacity on Eighth Amendment excessive force claim. FURTHER ORDERED, plaintiff's 17 motion for reconsideration of the screening order is DENIED. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 12/16/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lisle v. McDaniel et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
