Funches v. McDaniel et al
| 3:2010cv00127 |
| March 5, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| Valerie P. Cooke |
| Larry R. Hicks |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
67
ORDER ON 66 STIPULATION, Dismissing Case with Prejudice. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 1/23/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JK)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation 32 is ADOPTED AND ACCEPTED. Defenadant's Motion to Dismiss 17 is DENIED. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 9/13/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)
|
|
Filing
27
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke, on 5/16/2011. IT IS ORDERED that the court grants P's 24 motion for permission to file an amended opposition to Ds' 17 motion to dismiss. FURTH ORD that Ds shall file a reply to P's amended opposition within 7 days of the date of this order. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PM)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER ADOPTING AND ACCEPTING the 19 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and/or for Preliminary Injunction 10 is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 4/28/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk shall FILE the Complaint [1-2] (ack'd). FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's first, second, and third claims for relief are DISMISSED with prejudice. Plaintiff's fourth claim for relief states a colora ble Eighth Amendment claim based on conditions of confinement. All other claims within the fourth claim for relief are DISMISSED with prejudice. Plaintiff's fifth claim for relief states a Fourteenth Amendment equal protection claim based on di scriminatory treatment and a due process claim in connection with his disciplinary hearing. All other claims within the fifth claim for relief are DISMISSED with prejudice. FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall electronically serve a copy of this or der, along with a copy of Plaintiffs complaint, to the Office of the Attorney General of the State of Nevada (ack'd). The Attorney General shall advise the court within twenty-one (21) days of the date of entry of this order whether they can ac cept service of process for the named defendants and the last known address under seal of the defendants for which they cannot accept service. If the Attorney General accepts service of process for any of the defendants, such defendant(s) shall file and serve an answer or other response to the complaint within thirty (30)days of the date of the notice of acceptance of service. FURTHER ORDERED that the parties SHALL DETACH, COMPLETE, AND FILE the attached Notice of Intent to Proceed with Mediatio n form on or before thirty (30) days from the date of the entry of this order. FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall serve upon defendant(s) a copy of every pleading. (See Order for specifics). Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 11/2/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Funches v. McDaniel et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
