Moore v. Smith et al
| Attorney General for the State of Nevada and Greg Smith |
| 3:2010cv00194 |
| April 7, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
JUDGMENT. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the 24 Amended Complaint is DENIED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Clerk of Court, Lance S. Wilson on 9/30/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the 24 Amended Petition is DENIED WITH PREJUDICE. FURTHER ORDERED, that Petitioner is DENIED A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 9/29/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER. Petitioner has written to the court to advise that he has not received a copy of the Answer filed by respondents re 26 Letter. Petitioner is advised that in the future all communication with the Court should be in the form of a motion. Le tters of the nature presented here shall be stricken from the record. Respondents shall mail a second copy of the Answer to petitioner within five (5) days of receipt of this Order. Petitioner shall have thirty (30) days to file his reply. Thereafter, the matter shall be submitted for review. Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 5/9/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the 21 Motion to Amend is GRANTED. the Clerk shall detach and file the proposed amended petition. FURTHER ORDERED, respondents shall file their answer, including any and all defenses, within forty-five day s of entry of this order. Petitioner shall have thirty days thereafter to file his response and, if appropriate, respondents shall have twenty days to reply. Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 3/1/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER GRANTING petitioner's 19 Motion to Extend Time to Response to Court Order. The response to the 18 Court's Order shall be filed no later than 01/30/2011. (Notice of Compliance is due by 1/30/2011.) Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 12/20/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDERED that Rs' # 7 Motion to dismiss is GRANTED. The Court finds that grounds 1 is procedurally defaulted and is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. FURTHER ORD that ground 2 is unexhausted. FURTHER ORD that P shall have until 12/23/2010 to either: inf orm court re abandonment of unexhausted claims, or inform court he wished to dismiss petition w/o prejudice to exhaust, or file a motion for stay and abeyance. FURTHER ORD that if P elects to abandon his unexhausted grounds, Rs shall have thirty (30) days from the date P serves his declaration of abandonment in which to file an answer to P's remaining grounds for relief. P shall thereafter have twenty (20) days following service of Rs' answer in which to file a reply. FURTHER ORD that if P fails to respond to this order within the time permitted, this case may be dismissed. Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 11/22/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Moore v. Smith et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Attorney General for the State of Nevada | |
| Represented By: | Atiba Malik Moore |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Greg Smith | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
