Vincent v. Skolnik et al
| Lee A. Vincent |
| E. K. McDaniel and Howard Skolnik |
| 3:2010cv00291 |
| May 18, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| Larry R. Hicks |
| Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
JUDGMENT. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for the failure of plaintiff to comply with this court's 11 Order. Signed by Lance S. Wilson on 10/08/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED thta the Clerk shall FILE the complaint [1-2] (ack'd). FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's Fourteenth Amendment claim is DISMISSED with prejudice and without leave to amend. FURTHER ORDERED plaintiff's comp laint is DISMISSED with leave to amend. Plaintiff may choose to file an amended complaint if he can set forth an Eighth Amendment claim. FURTHER ORDERED plaintiff will have thirty (30) days to file the amended complaint. FURTHER ORDERED t hat the Clerk shall send to plaintiff a 1983 civil rights complaint form with instructions along with one copy of the original complaint. (Forms and a copy of the original complaint sent to plaintiff).( Amended Complaint deadline: 9/11/2010.) Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 8/11/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
