Esparza v. Warden et al
Petitioner: Anthony James Esparza
Respondent: Warden and Nevada Attorney General
Case Number: 3:2010cv00317
Filed: May 26, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Reno Office
Presiding Judge: Larry R. Hicks
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 10, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER denying 6 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. The clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. A certificate of appealability is GRANTED on the following issues (see order for details). Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 09/10/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
January 19, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that grounds 1(a), 1(d) - 1(m), 2,3,4,5, and 10 of the petition 6 are DISMISSED. FURTHER ORDERED that respondents shall have forty-five (45) days to answer/respond to the petition. Petitioner shall have forty-five (45) days to file a reply.(Responses due by 3/6/2011.) Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 1/15/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)
August 11, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the clerk file the petition for a writ of habeas corpus and the motion for appointment of counsel. FURTHER ORDERED, the motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED, the clerk shall send petit ioner a petition for writ of habeas corpus form with instructions. (Sent 8/13/2010.) Petitioner shall have thirty (30) days from the date of entry of this order in which to file an amended petition to correct the noted deficiencies. Failure t o comply with this order will result in the dismissal of ground 1(a), 1(d) through 1(m), 2, 3, 4, 5, and 10 from this action. FURTHER ORDERED, the clerk shall add Attorney General Catherine Cortez Masto as counsel for respondents and shall make infor mal electronic service of this order. Respondents' counsel shall enter a notice of appearance herein within twenty (20) days of entry of this order, but no further response shall be required from respondents until further order of this court. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 8/11/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO) Modified on 8/13/2010 to reflect respondents counsel electronically served, see NEF. (KO).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Esparza v. Warden et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Nevada Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Anthony James Esparza
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?