Harnist v. Colonial Bank NA et al
| Raymond G. Harnist |
| BAC Home Loans Servicing LP, Colonial Bank NA, Dodie Erlendson, First American National Default, First American Title, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., Recontrust Company and Ticor Title Company |
| 3:2010cv00331 |
| June 4, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| Edward C. Reed |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
67
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the 42 and 54 Motions to Dismiss are GRANTED. Because the claims remain with Judge Teilborg, the Court makes no ruling on the wrongful foreclosure claim or the injunctive and declaratory relief claims insofar as those claims relate to the wrongful foreclosure claim. Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 8/24/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO)
|
|
Filing
38
CERTIFIED COPY OF MDL ORDER FOR REMAND - Docket No. 09-2119-JAT. Motion to Remand Certain Claims are granted as follows: With respect to Harnist and Vega claims 2, 5-9 and 12-13 and part of claims 1, 3-4, and 10-11 remain with t he undersigned as part of the MDL and part of claims 1, 3-4, and 10-11 have been remanded to their transferor court. (See Order for additional specifics.) Signed by MDL Judge James A. Teilborg on 3/21/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
