Flowers v. Warden et al
Petitioner: John Flowers
Respondent: Nevada Attorney General and Warden
Case Number: 3:2010cv00367
Filed: June 18, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Reno Office
Presiding Judge:
Presiding Judge: Valerie P. Cooke
Referring Judge: Edward C. Reed
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 81 ORDER granting ECF No. 79 Motion to Provide Petitioner with address. See order for additional specifics. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 6/21/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DLS)
October 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 68 ORDER striking 61 motion to have District Court review exculpatory evidence. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 10/21/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
March 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that petitioner's 18 and 19 motions for an enlargement of time are GRANTED nunc pro tunc, in connection with petitioner's 20 filing of a response to the 15 show cause order on the federal time-bar issue. Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 3/14/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO)
December 7, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER GRANTING petitioner's 16 Motion to Extend Time. Petitioner shall file a response to the 15 Show Cause Order no later than 02/11/2011. (Show Cause Response due by 2/11/2011) Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 12/6/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)
August 2, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the Federal Public Defender's Office is appointed as counsel for petitioner. FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's 12 Second Motion to Appoint Counsel is DENIED AS MOOT. FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner sha ll have 120 days to show cause why the petition should not be dismissed with prejudice as time-barred. If respondents elect to file aresponse, they may do so no later than thirty (30) days from service of the show cause response. Petitioner then sha ll have twenty (20) days from service of the response within which to file a reply. The Clerk shall send a copy of this order to the CJA Coordinator for this Division (ack). NOTE: A copy of this Order was sent to petitioner.(Notice of Compliance is due by 11/30/2010.) Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 08/02/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Flowers v. Warden et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: John Flowers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Nevada Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?