Sutyagin et al v. Hamdan et al

Sutyagin et al v. Hamdan et al

Plaintiff:	Jonathan Lee Riches and Igor Sutyagin
Defendant:	Salim Ahmed Hamdan
Case Number:	3:2010cv00440
Filed:	July 16, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office:	Reno Office
Presiding Judge:	Larry R. Hicks
Presiding Judge:	Robert A. McQuaid
Nature of Suit:	Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 3, 2010	Filing 6 JUDGMENT. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for the failure of Plaintiff to comply with this court's order to pay the filing fee. Signed by Clerk of Court, Lance S. Wilson on 11/3/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PM)
September 20, 2010	Filing 3 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this entire action will be dismissed without prejudice unless plaintiff pays the $350.00 filing fee in full within thirty (30) days of entry of this order. FURTHER ORDERED, the Clerk shall send plaintif f two copies of this order. (Sent: 9/21/2010). Plaintiff shall make the necessary arrangement to have one copy of this order attached to the check paying the filing fee. FURTHER ORDERED, the Clerk shall retain the complaint. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 9/20/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO) Modified on 9/21/2010 to add verbiage to entry (KO).

Date Filed

Document Text

November 3, 2010

Filing 6 JUDGMENT. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for the failure of Plaintiff to comply with this court's order to pay the filing fee. Signed by Clerk of Court, Lance S. Wilson on 11/3/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PM)

September 20, 2010

Filing 3 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this entire action will be dismissed without prejudice unless plaintiff pays the $350.00 filing fee in full within thirty (30) days of entry of this order. FURTHER ORDERED, the Clerk shall send plaintif f two copies of this order. (Sent: 9/21/2010). Plaintiff shall make the necessary arrangement to have one copy of this order attached to the check paying the filing fee. FURTHER ORDERED, the Clerk shall retain the complaint. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 9/20/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO) Modified on 9/21/2010 to add verbiage to entry (KO).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sutyagin et al v. Hamdan et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Salim Ahmed Hamdan
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jonathan Lee Riches
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Igor Sutyagin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?