Pittman v. Baker et al
Delask Pittman |
AWP Renee Baker, Nevada Attorney General and Nevada, State of |
3:2010cv00447 |
July 19, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Reno Office |
Robert C. Jones |
Robert A. McQuaid |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 JUDGMENT. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED, as jurists of reason wouldnot find the dismissal of the present petition without prejudice to be either debatable or wrong. Signed by Lance S. Wilson on 08/12/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC) |
Filing 3 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the application 1 to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED without prejudice and that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice in favor of the prior-filed action (3:10-cv-271-ECR-VPC). FURTHER ORDERED that the < b> certificate of appealability is DENIED, as jurists of reason would not find the dismissal of the present petition without prejudice to be either debatable or wrong. The Clerk shall enter judgment dismissing this action without prejudice. The Clerk shall send petitioner a copy of his papers from this action (ack'd). Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 08/11/2010. NOTE: Copy of all documents sent to petitioner on 8/12/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.