Ames et al v. United States of America
| Jason Ames, Sabrina Ames, Lloyd Angier, Patricia Angier, June Baugh, Jane Bezayiff, Paul Bezayiff, Anthony Bochene, Patricia Brown-Anson, Bradley Camp, Susan Camp, Norma Canary, Roger Canary, Donald Cannon, Jennie Carrick, Kevin Carrick, Cassandra Cassinelli, Donald Cassinelli, Kara Christenson, Nate Christenson, Jason Cleary, Sarah Cleary, John Cleven, Marva Cleven, Richard Col, Ashley Conder, Hans Conder, Adam Cornutt, Nicole Cornutt, Laurie Donovan, Gregory Duff, Sandra Duff, Sylvia Fernandez, Theodore Flint, Linda Gallagher, Duane Garoutte, Yvonne Garoutte, Alex Gibson, Joy Gibson, Crisanto Guarin, James Holcomb, Jennifer Holcomb, Brent Howerton, Emily Hukill, Jason Hukill, Sandra Jones, Steven Jones, Gary Kase, Irene Kase, Avery Kindred, Jody Lancaster, Michale Lancaster, Katherine LeBlanc, Kelvin LeBlanc, Monte Lee, Stacey Lee, Nicole Lesco, Louise Lewis, Shelley Lewis, Patrick Mahoney, Tina Mahoney, Marie McCoy, Mark McCoy, Noah McCoy, Darrell Medlock, Joan Medlock, Oscar Morales, Rocio Morales, Shane Morales, Mike Morgan, Robin Morgan, Benjamin Narez, Cheryl Narez, Joe Narez, Dolores Oberg, Gary Oberg, Argentina Ortega, Robert Pearson, Tabitha Pearson, Brett Peterson, Rebecca Peterson, Scott Peterson, Teyana Peterson, Zachary Peterson, Gayle Picha, Steve Picha, Charles Pozenekoff, Diane Pozenekoff, Shelley Pringle, Michael Reeder, Pamela Reguli, Lorie Reiger, Steve Reiger, Laura Remsen, Christopher Reyes, Kimberly Reyes, Steven Reynolds, Mario Rodriguez, Silverio Rodriguez, Lucio Rosales, James Rowley, Kyle Rowley, Lisa Rowley, Andrea Sanchez, Paul Schaffer, Donna Schindele, Elizabeth Schinkel, Joseph Smithle, Jose Solis, Brandi St. Clair, Tyler St. Clair, Beverly Stauch, Carol Stauch, David Tabata, Maureen Tabata, Daniel Tapia, Jennifer Tapia, Chris Trueman, Marie Trueman, Debbie Vereschagin, Dennis Vereschagin, Rebecca Walters, Francine Weatherford, Jonathan Weatherford, Jeffrey Wells, Katie Wells, Kenneth Willaman, Rebecca Willaman, Carol Wilson, James Wilson, Beverly Woods, David Woods and Bruce Zettle |
| Donald Cannon, Marva Cleven and United States of America |
| 3:2010cv00463 |
| July 23, 2010 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| Larry R. Hicks |
| Robert A. McQuaid |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 Tort Claim |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
153
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE - In accordance with the terms of the class action settlement approved by the Court in these related actions each and every action captioned here and each and every claim alleged in each such action is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each party to bear their own costs and expenses of litigation including attorneys' fees. Signed by Judge Lloyd D. George on 4/12/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
151
ORDER - Anticipating the agreed upon global settlement in this class action and the dismissal of the FTCA cases, the following motions to set trial are denied without prejudice:Kroshus v. United States, 3:08-cv-0246-LDG (#882)Uhouse v. Bureau of Reclamation, 3:08-0285-LDG (#478)Adamson v. United States, 3:08-cv-621-LDG (#457)Moore v. United States, 3:09-cv-0167-LDG (#255)Adgett v. United States Department of Interior, 3:09-cv-0649-LDG (#195)Kroshus v. United States , 3:09-cv-0713-LDG (#416)Adamson v. United States Department of Interior, 3:09-cv-0715-LDG (#398)Ames v. Unites States, 3:10-cv-0463-LDG (# 146 )Signed by Judge Lloyd D. George on 3/31/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
|
Filing
149
ORDER denying without prejudice #879 motion in case 3:08-cv-246; denying without prejudice #413 motion in case 3:09-cv-713. Signed by Judge Lloyd D. George on 9/30/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
|
Filing
145
ORDER - The following motions are DENIED without prejudice subject to their reinstatement by the court in the due course of the aforementioned proceedings: Kroshus v. United States, 3:08-cv-0246-LDG Plaintiff Judy Kroshus renewal a nd reinstatement of motion for summaryjudgment regarding the level of flows through the Truckee Canal (#875) Moore v. United States, 3:09-cv-0167-LDG United States motion for summary judgment regarding discretionary function immunity (# 219) Adgett v. United States, 3:09-cv-0649-LDG United States motion for summary judgment regarding discretionary function immunity (#161) Kroshus v. United States, 3:09-cv-0713-LDG Plaintiffs renewal and reinstatement of motion for summary judgment regarding the level of flows through the Truckee Canal (#409) Adamson v. United States, 3:09-cv-0715-LDG United States motion for summary judgment regarding discretionary function immunity (#170) Ames v. United States, 3:10-cv-0463-LDG United States motion for summary judgment regarding discretionary function immunity (# 112 ) Signed by Judge Lloyd D. George on 9/26/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
144
THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that the following motions are DENIED without prejudice subject to their reinstatement by the court: Adamson v. United States , 3:08-cv-00621-LDG. United States' #25 Motion to dismiss, United States&# 039; #212 Motion for summary judgment as to Ten Specific Claims, and Plaintiffs' #446 Motion to dismiss renewal and reinstatement of motions. Moore v. United States , 3:09-cv-0167-LDG. Plaintiffs' #244 Motion to dismiss United States renewal United States' renewal and reinstatement of motions. Adgett v. United States , 3:09-cv-0649-LDG. Plaintiffs' #184 Motion to dismiss United States renewal and reinstatement of motions. A damson v. United States , 3:09-cv-0715-LDG. Plaintiffs' #387 Motion to dismiss United States renewal and reinstatement of motions. Ames v. United States , 3:10-cv-0463-LDG. Plaintiffs' # 27 Motion to convert motion to dismiss to motion for summary judgment, and Plaintiff's # 135 Motion to dismiss United States' renewal and reinstatement of motion to dismiss. Signed by Judge Lloyd D. George on 3/31/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
134
ORDER - The following motions are DENIED without prejudice subject to their reinstatement by the court in the due course of the aforementioned proceedings: Uhouse v. Bureau of Reclamation , 3:08-cv-0285-LDG : Plaintiffs' motio n to reconsider the magistrate judges order denying plaintiffs' motion to enforce settlement (#428) Adamson v. United States , 3:08-cv-0621-LDG : Motion for summary judgment as to ten specific claims (#212) Moore v. Unit ed States , 3:09-cv-0167-LDG : Motion to set date for trial (#215) Adgett v. United States , 3:09-cv-0649-LDG : Motion for summary judgment as to ten specific claims (#147), and Motion to set a date for trial (#157) Adam son v. United States , 3:09-cv-0715-LDG : Motion for summary judgment as to ten specific claims (#149), and Renewed motion to dismiss claims of 168 enumerated plaintiffs as untimely (#166) Ames v. United States , 3:10-cv-0463-LDG : Motion to set a date for trial (# 108 ) Signed by Judge Lloyd D. George on 3/27/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
132
ORDER GRANTING SPECIALLY APPEARING TRC's 125 MOTION FOR DETERMINATION OF GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT. (See pdf Order for specifics) Signed by Judge Lloyd D. George on 1/9/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
119
ORDER - The United States' renewal and reinstatement of # 94 Motion to dismiss is DENIED without prejudice. FURTHER ORD P's # 93 Motion to set a trail date is DENIED without prejudice. FURTHER ORD that, given the stipulation for dismissal of claims by plaintiff Estate of Bruce Zettel, counsel for plaintiff Bruce Zettel's # 77 Motion to withdraw as counsel is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Lloyd D. George on 9/28/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
82
THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that the United States motions for summary judgment regarding Flood Control Act immunity in Adamson v. United States (Adamson I), 3:08-cv-621-LDG-RAM (#127); Moore v. United States, 3:09-cv-167-LDG-RAM (#120); Adgett v. United States, 3:09-cv-649-LDG-RAM (#74); Adamson v. United States (Adamson II), 3:09-cv-715-LDG-RAM (#78); and Ames v. United States, 3:10-cv-463-LDG-RAM ( 33 ) are DENIED. Signed by Judge Lloyd D. George on 9/26/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO)
|
|
Filing
81
THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS: that in Kroshus v. United States (Kroshus I), 3:08-cv-00246-LDG-RAM, defendant Lynon Countys #564 is DENIED as moot; that in Kroshus v. United States (Kroshus II), 3:09-cv-00713-LDG-RAM, defendant Lyo n Countys #195 motion for summary judgment is DENIED as moot; that in Adgett v. United States, 3:09-cv-00649-LDG-RAM, the United States #69 motion to renew and reinstate that motion is DENIED as moot; that in Adgett v. United States, 3:09-cv-00649-LDG-RAM the United States #71 motion to renew and reinstate that motion is DENIED as moot; that in Kroshus v. United States (Kroshus II), 3:09-cv-00713-LDG-RAM, the United States #45 motion to dismiss duplicati ve claims by certain plaintiffs is hereby GRANTED;that in Adamson v. United States (Adamson II) 3:09-cv-00715-LDG-RAM, the United States #72 and #73 motions to renew those motions are DENIED as moot; that in Adamson v. United States (Adamson II) 3:09-cv-00715-LDG-RAM, the United States #75 motion to renew that motion is DENIED as moot.
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER. THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that the United States motion to dismiss VictoriaLopez Lasane in Adgett 20 is GRANTED, and its motion to dismiss Hayley McGrath andHazyn McGrath in Adgett 20 is DENIED as moot. THE COURT FURTHER ORDERS that the United States motion to dismiss duplicative claims in Adamson II 21 is GRANTED. THE COURT FURTHER ORDERS that the United States motion to dismiss plaintiffs identified as minors in Adamson I 25 is GRANTED. THE COURT FURTHER ORDERS th at the United States motion to dismiss debtors in bankruptcy in Adamson II 23 is GRANTED as to plaintiff Jeremy Gottlieb and DENIED without prejudice as to plaintiffs James and Denise Spracklin. Signed by Judge Lloyd D. George on 8/12/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)
|
|
Filing
74
ORDER GRANTING 53 Motion for Good Faith Settlement Determination and Dismissal of Claims re 72 Proposed Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert A. McQuaid, Jr on 8/4/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER.The following motions will be heard by the court on Monday, June 13, 2011, in Reno, Nevada, at 9:00 am in a courtroom to be determined and posted at a later date; and continued, if necessary, to Tuesday, June 14, 2011, at 9:00 am. Ada mson v. United States (Adamson I), 3:08-cv-621-LDG-RAM - United States motion to dismiss (#25) (denied without prejudice to reconsideration of issues on summary judgment) (reinstated for purposes of this hearing) United States motion for summary judg ment regarding Flood Control Act immunity(#127) Moore v. United States, 3:09-cv-167-LDG-RAM - United States motion to dismiss (#9) (denied without prejudice to reconsideration of issues on summary judgment) (reinstated for purposes of this h earing) United States motion for summary judgment regarding Flood Control Act immunity (#120) Adgett v. United States, 3:09-cv-649-LDG-RAM - United States motion to strike jury demand (#19) (denied without prejudice toreinstatement) United S tates motion to dismiss duplicative claims (#20) (denied without prejudice to reinstatement) United States motion to dismiss (#21) (denied without prejudice to reinstatement) United States motion for summary judgment regarding Flood Control Act immun ity (#74) Adamson v. United States (Adamson II), 3:09-cv-715-LDG-RAM - United States motion to strike jury demand (#20) (denied without prejudice toreinstatement) United States motion to dismiss duplicative claims (#21) (denied without preju dice to reinstatement) United States motion to dismiss (#23) (denied without prejudice to reinstatement) United States motion for summary judgment regarding Flood Control Act immunity (#78) Ames v. United States, 3:10-cv-463-LDG-RAM - United States motion to dismiss (#15) United States motion to strike claims of prejudgement interest and attorneys fees (#17) Plaintiffs motion to convert motion to dismiss to motion for summary judgment (#27) United States motion for summary judgment regarding Flood Control Act immunity (#33) ( Motion Hearing set for 6/13/2011 09:00 AM before Judge Lloyd D. George.) Signed by Judge Lloyd D. George on 4/18/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER. The following FTCA jurisdictional and related FTCA non-Flood Control Act motions will be heard by the court at the April 18, 2011, hearing in Reno: Adamson v. United States (Adamson I), 3:08-cv-621-LDG-RAM: United States' motion to dismiss (#25) (denied without prejudice to reconsideration of issues on summary judgment) (reinstated for purposes of this hearing); Moore v. United States, 3:09-cv-167-LDG-RAM: United States' motion to dismiss (#9) (deni ed without prejudice to reconsideration of issues on summary judgment) (reinstated for purposes of this hearing); Adgett v. United States, 3:09-cv-649-LDG-RAM: United States' motion to strike jury demand (#27) (denied without preju dice to reinstatement) United States' motion to dismiss duplicative claims (#20) (denied without prejudice to reinstatement) United States' motion to dismiss (#21) (denied without prejudice to reinstatement) Adamson v. U nited States (Adamson II), 3:09-cv-715-LDG-RAM: United States' motion to strike jury demand (#20) (denied without prejudice to reinstatement) United States' motion to dismiss duplicative claims (#21) (denied without prejudice to reinstatement) United States' motion to dismiss (#23) (denied without prejudice to reinstatement) Ames v. United States, 3:10-cv-463-LDG-RAM: United States' 15 motion to dismiss United States' 17 motio n to strike claims of prejudgement interest and attorneys fee) Plaintiffs' 27 motion to convert motion to dismiss to motion for summary judgment. Signed by Judge Lloyd D. George on 4/12/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER: THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that the following motions are DENIED without prejudice subject to their reinstatement by the court in the due course of the aforementioned proceedings: Kroshus v. United States (Kroshus I), 3:08-cv-0246-LDG-RAM Defenda nt Greater Nevada Builders and Steven F. Campoys renewed motion to dismiss for failure to timely effect service of the complaint and for failure to state aclaim upon which relief can be granted 447 - Federal defendants motion for summary judgment [ 461], Uhouse v. Bureau of Reclamation, 3:08-cv-0285-LDG-RAM, and Federal defendants motion for summary judgment 218 . Moore v. United States, 3:09-cv-0167-LDG-RAM - Plaintiffs motion for certification of class action and for appointment of class co unsel 68 . Kroshus v. United States (Kroshus II), 3:09-cv-0713-LDG-RAM -Defendant Crisp Development, Inc.s motion to dismiss 71 , Defendants Greater Nevada Builders and Steven F. Campoys motion to dismiss 79 , Defendant Truckee Carson Irrigation District and David P. Overvolds motion to dismiss 83 , and Federal defendants motion for summary judgment 112 . THE COURT FURTHER ORDERS that, as previously indicated in the 10/21/2010 hearing, defendant Truckee Carson Irrigation Districts pending motion for mediation in Kroshus v. United States (Kroshus I) 495 , 3:09-cv-0713-LDG-RAM is GRANTED. THE COURT FURTHER ORDERS that plaintiffs motion to exceed local rule 7-4 page limitation in Adgett v. United States, 3:09-cv-0649-LDG-RAM 34 is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Lloyd D. George on 3/29/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER. The Court hereby ORDERS that a video conference hearing presided over by this court in Las Vegas from Courtroom 6B at the Lloyd D. George United States Courthouse to Courtroom 6 in Reno at the Bruce R. Thompson United States Courthouse and F ederal Building shall be conducted on Thursday, March 24, 2011, at 2:00 p.m. to hear arguments on the following motions:Adamson, et al. v. United States (Adamson I), 3:08-cv-621-LDG-RAM: United States' motion to strike class al legations (dkt #26) (denied without prejudice to subsequent reinstatement); Moore, et al. v. United States, 3:09-cv-167-LDG-RAM:United States' motion to strike class action allegations (dkt #10) (denied without prejudice to reco nsideration in ruling on the motion for class certification)Plaintiffs' motion for class certification (dkt #68);Adamson, et al. v. United States (Adamson II), 3:09-cv-715-LDG-RAM:United States' motion to strike class action allegations (dkt #22) (denied for case management purposes without prejudice to reinstatement). Signed by Judge Lloyd D. George on 3/16/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO)
|
|
Filing
20
CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER re # 19 Stipulated Proposed Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert A. McQuaid, Jr on 11/16/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER that, in the interests of case management and the consolidation for oral argument of pending dispositive and consolidation motions, and pending discussion during the video conference hearing of the potential for mediation, the following motions are DENIED without prejudice to their reinstatement following the scheduling of oral argument on pending dispositive and consolidation motions: (See Attached PDF/Image for Specifics.) Signed by Judge Lloyd D. George on 9/27/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - BLG)
|
|
Filing
7
THE COURT ORDERS that a video conference hearing on TCID's Motion (Ref. Doc. #495 in case no. 3:08-cv-00246) for mediation of all claims shall be conducted on September 15, 2010 at 1:00 PM. The parties in the captioned cases shall be pre sent in Reno, Nevada, in a Courtroom to be designated later by minute order, and Judge Lloyd D. George shall preside from Las Vegas, Nevada. ( See pdf Order for additional specifics ) Signed by Judge Lloyd D. George on 8/13/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
