Keife v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
| Royal Bradford Keife |
| defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and counsel Albert F Pagni |
| 3:2010cv00546 |
| September 7, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
162
ORDER GRANTING Defendant's 136 and 141 Motions for Summary Judgment. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of court shall enter judgment in favor of defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and against plaintiff Royal Bradford Keife in case 3:10-cv-0546-LRH-VPC. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of court shall enter judgment in favor of defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and against plaintiff Brenda J. Simon in case 3:11-cv-0916-LRH-VPC. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 03/08/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
|
Filing
116
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for leave to file a third amended complaint 78 Is GRANTED. Plaintiff Royal Bradford Keife shall have ten (10) days from entry of this order to file the third amended complaint attached to his moti on 78 (Exhibit 1). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to certify class 55 and motion for partial summary judgment 58 are DENIED without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 1/27/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that P's 12 motion for leave to file a second amended complaint, 17 motion for class certification, and 26 motion for oral argument on the motion for class certification are DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 6/22/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PM)
|
|
Filing
24
AGREED ORDER Re: 22 Stipulation. By agreement of the parties, IT IS ORDERED that the Second Amended Class Action Complaint/Jury Demand is filed with the Court. The Second, Third, and Fourth causes of action of the Second Amended Complaint are dismissed without prejudice. Defendant shall have 35 days to file the Motion to Dismiss; Plaintiff shall have 35 days after to file the Response; and, Defendant shall have 35 days to file the Reply. (See Order).(Motions due by 11/23/2010) Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 10/18/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
