Crawford v. Battrick et al
| Robert Crawford |
| Renee Baker, William Battrick, Thomas Prince and State of Nevada ex rel Nevada Department of Corrections |
| 3:2010cv00683 |
| November 1, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| Robert A. McQuaid |
| Edward C. Reed |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
11
ORDER. Before the Court is plaintiff's letter construed as a Motion for Clarification 10 which seeks confirmation of the date of remand of this matter to the Seventh Judicial DistrictCourt of Nevada. The Motion is GRANTED. The Clerk shall send the parties a copy of the Court'sOrder for remand 9 . The defendants shall be servedelectronically, the plaintiff via U.S. Mail. (Ack'd) Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 3/16/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's 3 Motion for Remand is GRANTED. This matter shall be remanded to the Seventh Judicial District Court. The Clerk shall close this action. (Clerk sent certified copy of this order and docket sheet to the Seventh Judicial District Court at 801 Clark St., Ste. 4, Ely, NV 89301, on 12/20/2010.) Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 12/20/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
