Light Guard Systems, Inc vs Spot Devices, Inc.
| Light Guard Systems, Inc |
| Spot Devices, Inc. |
| 3:2010cv00737 |
| November 23, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| Larry R. Hicks |
| Robert A. McQuaid |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
153
JUDGMENT. The Court HEREBY ORDERS, ADJUDGES, AND DECREES that: 1. Light Guards claim that all versions of the RS200 and RS320 infringe the 742 patent is dismissed with prejudice. 2. The Court enters judgment in favor of Spot Devices, Inc. for its declaratory judgment counterclaim of non-infringement, and declares that none of the versions of the RS200 and RS320 IRWLs at issue in this case infringe claims 1 - 15 of the 742 patent. 3. This is a final, appealable, judgment disposing of all claims asserted in this action. 4. The parties are each responsible for their own costs. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 7/12/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PM)
|
|
Filing
145
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the disputed claim terms and phrases are to be construed consistent with the court's order herewith. IT IS SO ORDERED. (See Order for specifics). Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 6/12/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)
|
|
Filing
115
IT IS ORDERED that LightGuard and Spot shall file supplemental briefs on the following points as they pertain to the appropriate party (as specified herein, see pdf order for specifics ). FURTHER ORDERED that the LightGuard and Spot shall file simultaneous briefs on or before January 30, 2012. The Clerk of Court shall calendar this matter for a hearing. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 1/18/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
100
STIPULATED ORDER Modifying the Court's Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. Expert disclosures on issues for which a party bears the burden of proof will be due thirty (30) days after the latter of the close of fact discovery on January 27, 201 2 or the date the Court issues a claim construction order. Rebuttal expert disclosures will be due forty (40) days after initial expert disclosures. Expert discovery cut-off will be forty-five (45) days after the last rebuttal expert reports are serv ed. If a party intends to file a dispositive motion, counsel for that party shall notify opposing counsel and the court of its intention no later than fifteen (15) days after the close of expert discovery. Dispositive motions must be filed by thirty (30) days after the close of expert discovery. In the event dispositive motions are filed, thedate for filing the joint pretrial order shall be suspended until thirty (30) days after decision on the dispositive motions or further order of the Court. The joint pretrial order shall be filed thirty (30) days after the close of expert discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 12/14/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER denying 2 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. See order for specifics. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 7/22/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Light Guard Systems, Inc vs Spot Devices, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Light Guard Systems, Inc | |
| Represented By: | Cassandra Joseph |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Spot Devices, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
