National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA et al v. Porter Hayden Company
American Home Assurance Company and National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA |
Porter Hayden Company |
Western Asbestos Settlement Trust |
3:2011cv00014 |
January 7, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Reno Office |
Larry R. Hicks |
Robert A. McQuaid |
Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 36 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the court concludes that in the interest of having general discovery issues receive uniform treatment regardless of where the discovery is pursued, objections of the claimants to the subpoena served on WAST should be deter mined by the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, Baltimore Division. Counsel shall modify the draft confidentiality agreement found at Exhibit 1 to the parties' 32 joint statement, to reflect the court's Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 12/2/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO) |
Filing 35 MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS - Motion Hearing held on 11/22/2011 before Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb. Crtrm Administrator: Lia Griffin; Pla Counsel: Daniel Hayward, Kristen Vine (telephonically); Def Counsel: n/a; Interested Part y Counsel: Wayne Klomp and John P. Sande, III; FTR 9:01 - 9:31; Courtroom: 2; ORDER finding as moot 8 Motion to Strike. ORDER staying 1 Motion to Compel. See attached minutes for specifics. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LG) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.