Hibbler v. State of Nevada et al
| Kenneth Hibbler |
| Howard Skolnik, Jack Palmer, John Peery, Rex Reed, Greg Cox, Bill Donat, Peter Gibson, Kevin Halow, C/O Henson, John Keast, Dr. Rebecca Loftis, Nevada Department of Corrections, State of Nevada, Dr. John Schofield, James Benedetti, C/O Bergstrum and Dr. Bruce Bannister |
| 3:2011cv00067 |
| January 28, 2011 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| Valerie P. Cooke |
| Larry R. Hicks |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
78
ORDER adopting and accepting 77 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, denying 55 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Kenneth Hibbler, and granting 56 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Rexwinkle. Summary judgment shall be entered in Defendant Rexwinkel's favor as to Plaintiff's First Amendment retaliation claim. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 6/29/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
|
|
Filing
76
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke, on 4/19/2013, DENYING Defendant Rexwinkle's 74 Motion to Strike. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDERED Clerk shall E-serve this order, # 24 Screening order and copy of # 25 Amended complaint on AG. ( E-service of Screening order and amended complaint via NEF regeneration on 11/30/2011. ) AG shall advise by 12/21/2011 re acceptance of servic e; and file under seal addresses of Ds for which it cannot accept service. If service not accepted, then P must file motion re unserved Ds. If AG accepts service, then answer/response due 60 days from date of this order. Henceforth P shall serve D or Ds' counsel a copy of every document submitted for consideration together with a certificate of mailing. Signed by Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke on 11/28/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER - The Court finds that the parties will benefit from informal discussions in an effort to settle this case. The Court encourages the parties to engage in such discussions. For this reason, a courtesy copy of this order and the complaint shall be provided to defendant' counsel by the Clerk of the Court. ( E-service of Order on 9/1/2011; # 25 Amended Complaint via NEF Regeneration on 9/1/2011 ) Signed by Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke on 9/1/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff has thirty (30) days from the date of this Order to file his amended complaint. FURTHER ORDERED, plaintiff is expressly warned that failure to file an amended complaint will result in the dismissal of this entire action. Signed by Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke on 7/11/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
