Mizzoni v. State of Nevada ex rel. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
| Joseph L. Mizzoni |
| Adam Endel, E.K. McDaniel, State of Nevada ex rel. Nevada Department of Corrections and Ronald Bryant |
| 3:2011cv00186 |
| March 14, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| Valerie P. Cooke |
| Edward C. Reed |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
86
JUDGMENT. Signed by Clerk of Court, Lance S. Wilson on 8/20/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
63
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb, on 10/16/2013, denying 59 Motion to Compel. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER DENYING 45 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Clerk shall file and electronically serve this order, the screening order, and Plaintiff's complaint on the NV AG's office, attn Kat Howe (service completed 6/25/13). AG to advise court withi n 21 days regarding service (see order for instructions on service). Answer due within 60 days for any defendants represented. Plaintiff shall serve defendants copy of all pleadings. Henceforth, Plaintiff to serve defendants copy of every pleading, motion, or document submitted for consideration by the court. Plaintiff shall include with original paper submitted for filing a certificate of mailing. See order for further details. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 06/24/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER: Defendants shall file their Report of the Attorney General Re: Results of the 90-Day Stay within 7 days of the date of entry of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 05/16/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
|
Filing
28
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb, on 10/4/2011. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's 27 Motion to Respond to Defendant's Notice of Plaintiff's Non-Compliance with Order is DENIED as moot. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO)
|
|
Filing
26
JUDGMENT - This action is DISMISSED with prejudice for the failure of plaintiff to file an amended complaint. Signed by Clerk of Court, Lance S. Wilson on 10/3/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for district judge to reconsider Screening Order 19 is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff has thirty (30) days from the date this Order is entered to file his amended complaint in confo rmance with this court's Screening Order dated 5/11/2011,if he chooses to file an amended complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff is expressly cautioned that failure to file an amended complaint in conformance with this courts Screening Order dated 5/11/2011 will result in the dismissal of this action with prejudice. (Amended Complaint deadline: 8/27/2011.) Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 7/27/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC) Modified on 7/29/2011 text correction. (BLG).
|
|
Filing
18
ORDERED that P shall have an additional 28 days within which to file an amended complaint in accordance with Order (# 10 ). If P fails to do so, the action will be dismissed. ( P's Amended Complaint due by 8/9/2011. ) Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 7/12/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
