Fields v. LeGrand et al
Petitioner: Matthew Arthur Fields
Respondent: Robert LeGrand and Nevada Attorney General
Case Number: 3:2011cv00341
Filed: May 12, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Reno Office
Presiding Judge: Larry R. Hicks
Presiding Judge: Robert A. McQuaid
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 6, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ORDERED that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus (ECF No. 6) is DENIED. The clerk of the court shall enter judgment accordingly and close this action. FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 3/6/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
March 24, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER granting 29 Motion to Dismiss. Claims dismissed as indicated in attached order. Answer to remaining claims due within 45 days. Reply due within 45 days of service of answer. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 3/24/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
May 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 28 AMENDED ORDER re 27 Order (correcting petition doc. no.; corresponding answer due date ) : Petitioner's # 24 Motion to reopen is GRANTED. This action is REINSTATED. FURTHER ORDERED that respondents shall have 45 days from the date on whi ch this order is entered to answer or otherwise respond to the # 6 Petition. Reply due 45 days from service of answer. FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's # 25 Motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that, from this date forward, the hard copy of any exhibits shall be forwarded - for this case - to the staff attorneys in Las Vegas. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 5/6/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
March 26, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER granting 24 Motion to Reopen Case; denying 25 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Respondents' answer due 5/10/2014. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 03/25/2014. Hard copies of exhibits shall be forwarded, for this case, to the staff attorneys in Las Vegas. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
February 6, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDERED that P's # 20 Motion to stay is GRANTED. FURTHER ORD that this action is STAYED pending exhaustion. P may move to reopen the matter following exhaustion. FURTHER ORD that the grant of a stay is conditioned upon P filing a state post-con viction petition or other appropriate proceeding in state court within 45 days from the entry of this order and returning to federal court with a motion to reopen within 45 days of issuance of the remittitur. FURTHER ORD that the Clerk shall ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE this action, until such time as the court grants a motion to reopen the matter. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 2/6/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
November 16, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDERED that Rs' # 12 Motion for leave to file Exhibit 14 under seal is GRANTED. FURTHER ORD Rs' # 9 Motion to dismiss the petition is GRANTED in part, and DENIED in part (as specified herein). FURTHER ORDERED that P shall by 12/17/201 1 either: (1) inform this court in a sworn declaration that he wishes to abandon the unexhausted grounds; OR (2) inform this court in a sworn declaration that he wishes to dismiss this petition without prejudice in order to return to state court to e xhaust; OR (3) file a motion for a stay and abeyance. FURTHER ORD that if P elects to abandon his unexhausted grounds, Rs' answer to remaining grounds due 30 days from the date P serves his declaration of abandonment. FURTHER ORD that P shall have 30 days following service of Rs' answer in which to file a reply. FURTHER ORD that if P fails to respond to this order within the time permitted, this case may be dismissed. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 11/16/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
June 21, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDERED that the Clerk shall FILE and E- SERVE the petition #'s 1 -2, 1 -3) on the Rs. FURTHER ORD that Rs' answer/response to petition due by 8/5/2011. If an answer is filed, P shall have 45 days from the date of service of the answer to file a reply. FURTHER ORD that, henceforth, P shall serve AG a copy of every document he submits for consideration, with a certificate of service. FURTHER ORD that the Clerk shall DETACH and FILE P's motion for appointment of counsel (# 1 -4). FURTHER ORD that P's motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED without prejudice. ( E-service upon AG, and copy of filed petition mailed to P on 6/21/2011 ) Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 6/20/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fields v. LeGrand et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Matthew Arthur Fields
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Robert LeGrand
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Nevada Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?