Bartlett v. Nevin et al
| Stephen Bartlett |
| Nevada Attorney General and Nevin |
| Catherine Cortez-Masto |
| 3:2011cv00349 |
| May 16, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| Valerie P. Cooke |
| Edward C. Reed |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
JUDGMENT. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus 4 is DENIED IN ITS ENTIRETY. FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner is DENIED A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. Signed by Clerk of Court, Lance S. Wilson on 1/18/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. IT IS ORDERED that petitioner's motion for finding of contempt 23 and motion to rule in petitioners favor 24 are both DENIED.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus 4 is DENIED IN ITS EN TIRETY. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT accordingly and close this case. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner is DENIED A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 1/17/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDERED that Rs' # 13 Motion for leave to file Exhibit 10 under seal is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that Rs' # 8 Motion to dismiss the petition is GRANTED in part, and DENIED in part ( see pdf order for specifics ). FURTHER ORD P shall by 10/15/2011 either: inform court in sworn declaration that he wishes to abandon the unexhausted grounds and proceed on the exhausted grounds; OR inform court in a sworn declaration that he wishes to dismiss this petition without prejudice in order to return to state court to exhaust his unexhausted claims; OR file a motion for a stay and abeyance pending exhaustion in state court. FURTHER ORD that if P elects to abandon unexhausted grounds, the Rs answer to remaining grounds due 30 days from dat e of service of declaration. FURTHER ORD P shall have 30 days following service of Rs' answer to file a reply. FURTHER ORD if P fails to respond to this order within the time permitted, this case may be dismissed. Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 9/13/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's 1 application to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED, the Clerk shall FILE and ELECTRONICALLY SERVE the petition on the respondents (See 4 NEF for d etail). FURTHER ORDERED, respondents shall have forty-five (45) days from entry of this order within which to answer, or otherwise respond to, the petition. If an answer is filed, petitioner shall have forty-five (45) days from the dat e of service of the answer to file a reply. FURTHER ORDERED, petitioner is provided filing instructions and requirements for this action. FURTHER ORDERED, the Clerk shall DETACH and FILE petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel (docket # 1 -2). FURTHER ORDERED, petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 6/6/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
