Haack v. Carson City et al
Plaintiff: Wayne Phillip Haack
Defendant: Jose Delfin, Carson City, City of and Scott Davis
Case Number: 3:2011cv00353
Filed: May 17, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Reno Office
Presiding Judge: Larry R. Hicks
Presiding Judge: Robert A. McQuaid
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 10, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 57 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING 44 Motion for Summary Judgment as follows : (1) P's federal claims set forth in the Complaint as the First through Fourth claims for relief are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and (2) Summary judgment shall be entered in favor of Carson City and Davis as to P's state law claims set forth in the Complaint as the Fifth through Tenth claims for relief. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert A. McQuaid, Jr on 9/10/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) Modified on 9/10/2012 to clarify title (DRM).
August 22, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 55 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant Delfin's Motion to Dismiss 38 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows: (1) Plaintiff's Fourth Amendment claim (and accompanying request for attorney's fees un der 42 USC § 1988) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to defendant Delfin; (2) Plaintiff's Fourth Amendment conspiracy claim ((and accompanying request for attorney's fees under 42 USC § 1988) is DISMISSED WITH LEAVE TO AMEN D as to defendant Delfin. If Plaintiff elects to amend his Complaint, he is instructed to address the deficiencies under FRCP 12(b)(6) as well as those related to the Noerr-Pennington doctrine's "sham" exception, as outlined above. Plaintiff shall have twenty-one days from the date of this order to file an amended complaint, if he so chooses; (3) SUMMARY JUDGMENT is granted in favor of defendant Delfin as to Plaintiff's state law claims for intentional infliction of emotional distress and negligence. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert A. McQuaid, Jr on 8/22/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HJ)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Haack v. Carson City et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jose Delfin
Represented By: Rebecca Bruch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carson City, City of
Represented By: Katherine F. Parks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Scott Davis
Represented By: Katherine F. Parks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wayne Phillip Haack
Represented By: William C. Jeanney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?