Sims v. Palmer et al
| Azujhon Kenneth Sims |
| Nevada Attorney General and Jack Palmer |
| 3:2011cv00512 |
| July 18, 2011 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Reno Office |
| Robert A. McQuaid |
| Edward C. Reed |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
ORDER re 15 USCA Order : ORDERED that this court reaffirms that NO CERTIFICATEOF APPEALABILITY SHALL ISSUE. ( E-mail notice (NEF) sent to the US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit on 4/12/2012 re USCA case 12-15703 .) Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 4/12/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER DENYING 9 Motion for District Judge to Reconsider Order. Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 3/21/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDERED P's # 1 Application to proceed IFP is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall DETACH and FILE petition for a extra-ordinary writ of habeas corpus (docket # 1 -2) and petition for a writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum (docket # 1 -3). FURTHER ORD that both petitions are DENIED. No certificate of appealability shall issue. FURTHER ORD the Clerk shall ENTER JUDGMENT and close this case. Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 7/26/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
